Save
...
Q9
Tort theories
Public policy - negligence for PEL an Pysch harm
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Jess T
Visit profile
Cards (17)
What type of loss is primarily involved in most negligence claims?
Economic loss
View source
What is the distinction between consequential and pure economic loss in negligence claims?
Consequential losses
can be
recovered
,
pure cannot
View source
In the case of Spartan Steel, what type of loss was compensated?
Losses due to
damage
View source
Why did the courts rule against recovering pure economic loss in Spartan Steel?
Losses should be recovered under
contract
View source
What concern did the courts have regarding pure economic loss claims?
Floodgates
of excessive claims
View source
How did Spartan Steel's situation differ regarding contracts with the negligent party?
They had no contract with the negligent party
View source
Under what condition can pure economic losses be recovered in cases of negligent misstatements?
When there is
negligent advice
and often a
contract
View source
What is a requirement for claims of pure economic loss to be allowed?
Existence of a
special relationship
View source
What was the outcome in Goodwill v BPAS regarding claims?
Unknown
sexual partner could not sue clinic
View source
What was the ruling in Caparo v Dickman regarding claims?
Unknown
shareholder
could not sue
accountant
View source
What is the primary requirement for primary victims to prove in psychiatric injury claims?
They must show they were directly
involved
View source
What additional hurdles do secondary victims face in psychiatric injury claims?
Must prove several specific
conditions
View source
What are the requirements for secondary victims to claim psychiatric injury?
D was
negligent
Recognizable
psychiatric injury
Close tie of love and affection
Injury suffered at the scene or aftermath
Injury through own senses
Reasonable person
would suffer same injury
View source
What case established many restrictions for secondary victims' claims?
Alcock
following the
Hillsborough
incident
View source
Why are there restrictive rules for secondary victims' claims?
To prevent
excessive claims
and costs
View source
What was the outcome in Robertson Rough v Forth Road Bridge?
Colleagues were not able to
claim
View source
What was the ruling in White v CCSY regarding police officers?
Police officers not at
risk
could not
claim
View source