A limitiation is the F-scale has been criticised as a measurement of an authoritarian personality
Acquiescence bias: people tend to agree to questions
The F-Scale was written in a way that agreeing to all the questions would artificially inflate their score on the authoritarianism scale leading to inaccurate measurement
Additionally, Adorno was a left-wing thinker, and some questions are argued to be biased against people with a right-wing political view
(+) Elms and Milgram (1966)
Twenty obedient males who had given the highest levels of shock in previous Milgram studies and twenty defiant males who had refused were given the F scale
The obedient males scored significantly higher on the F scale, suggesting they had authoritarian personalities; they also tended to dehumanise or hold more negative attitudes towards the learner and see the experimenter as someone knowledgeable and trustworthy
(+) Explains extreme variations of obedience in Milgram’s Px
In Milgram's study, a significant proportion, 35%, resisted the authority figure; this can't be explained by situational factors alone, as each participant had precisely the same experience
However, Adorno's theory acknowledges that the willingness to obey an authority figure can vary from person to person, offering an explanation as to why there are extreme variations in Milgram's participants