Quantitative numerical data collected by the government
Provide a wealth of data that is usually hard to access
High reliability
High representativeness
May define terms differently
Lack validity according to interpretivists
Unofficial statistics
Quantitative data collected by non-governmental sources
Representative and reliable
Not standardised- might lack reliability
Personal documents
Qualitative personal documents such as letters, diaries, and photographs
Gives a broader insight
Detailed- raises validity according to interpretivists
Difficult to make comparisons- lowers reliability
Low in representativeness
Content analysis
Systematically studying the content of documents or media and providing qualitative and quantitative data
Practical and cheap
Can provide large scale, representative research
Can be longitudinal
Reliable as results can be cross-checked
Time consuming
Risk of subjectivity
Longitudinal studies
Conducted over a long period of time, same sample visited more than once
Expensive and time consuming - very helpful as secondary data
High validity and representativeness as it provides more than a snapshot. Small samples lower representativeness in terms of sample size and diversity
Low reliability
Two types of longitudinal studies
Panel = sample is the focus of data collection at least twice and the data is collected from types of case within a panel study framework, such as people, households, schools, etc.
Cohort = the focus of data collection is an entire cohort or a random sample of them and the cohort is made up of people who share a certain characteristic.