Save
Psychology
Social influence
Asch
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Freya Cobby
Visit profile
Cards (15)
Asch (1951)
Aim- To asses the
extent
to which people will conform to the opinion of others
Baseline
procedure
125
male
ppts, each in a group with other
confederates
Shown a card that had
three
lines on it
Shown another card with a line that clearly
matched
one of the others
The ppts had to say
outloud
what line
X
matched
Baseline
findings
Ppts agreed with
confederates
wrong
answers
36.5%
of the time
Only
25%
never conformed
VARIABLES -
Group
size
aim
To find out is a
larger
group
size would be
more
important to
agreement
VARIABLES - Group
size
procedure
Varied
confederates
from
1
-
15
VARIABLES
- Group size findings
Found a
curvilinear
relationship between
group
size
and
conformity rate
Conformity
rate
increased
with
group
size to a
point
3
confederates -
31.8%
Any more
leveled
off rates
VARIABLES
- unanimity
aim
To find out if the presence of a
non conforming
person
affected
ppts
answer
VARIABLES - Unanimity
procedure
Introduced a
confederate
who
disagreed
with the other
confederates
VARIABLES -
Unanimity
findings
Influence
of the
majority
depends on it being
unanimous
VARIABLES - Task difficulty aim
To find out if making the task harder would affect the degree of
conformity
VARIABLES
-
task difficulty
findings
conformity
increased
when it becomes harder
EVALUATION -
Weakness
- Real world application
Ppts knew they were in a
research study
so may have displayed
demand
characteristics
Did not
display
groups in
real
life
EVALUATION-
Weakness
-
Limited
application
Ppts were all
American
men
American
is an
individualist
culture
study done in
collectivist
culture
china
shows
higher
conformity rates
EVALUATION -
Strength
-
Research
support
Similar study done with
maths problems
ppts
conformed
more when questions became
harder
COUNTERPOINT
found
conformity
more
complex
than
asch
suggested
Can be down to
person
and
confidence
EVALUATION - Weakness - Ethical issues
Ppts were
deceived