Cards (15)

  • Asch (1951)
    Aim- To asses the extent to which people will conform to the opinion of others
  • Baseline procedure
    1. 125 male ppts, each in a group with other confederates
    2. Shown a card that had three lines on it
    3. Shown another card with a line that clearly matched one of the others
    4. The ppts had to say outloud what line X matched
  • Baseline findings
    1. Ppts agreed with confederates wrong answers 36.5% of the time
    2. Only 25% never conformed
  • VARIABLES - Group size aim
    To find out is a larger group size would be more important to agreement
  • VARIABLES - Group size procedure
    1. Varied confederates from 1 - 15
  • VARIABLES - Group size findings 

    • Found a curvilinear relationship between group size and conformity rate
    • Conformity rate increased with group size to a point
    • 3 confederates - 31.8%
    • Any more leveled off rates
  • VARIABLES - unanimity aim
    To find out if the presence of a non conforming person affected ppts answer
  • VARIABLES - Unanimity procedure
    1. Introduced a confederate who disagreed with the other confederates
  • VARIABLES - Unanimity findings
    • Influence of the majority depends on it being unanimous
  • VARIABLES - Task difficulty aim
    To find out if making the task harder would affect the degree of conformity
  • VARIABLES - task difficulty findings
    • conformity increased when it becomes harder
  • EVALUATION - Weakness - Real world application

    • Ppts knew they were in a research study so may have displayed demand characteristics
    • Did not display groups in real life
  • EVALUATION- Weakness - Limited application
    • Ppts were all American men
    • American is an individualist culture
    • study done in collectivist culture china shows higher conformity rates
  • EVALUATION - Strength - Research support
    • Similar study done with maths problems
    • ppts conformed more when questions became harder
    COUNTERPOINT
    • found conformity more complex than asch suggested
    • Can be down to person and confidence
  • EVALUATION - Weakness - Ethical issues
    Ppts were deceived