Atypical gender development - gender dysphoria

• Define gender dysphoria

  Gender dysphoria refers to the distress an individual feels if there is a mismatch between their external sex characteristics and their psychological identity as being either a man or a woman. The first signs of gender dysphoria typically appear at a very young age whereby a child may refuse to wear clothes or engage in activities typically associated with their gender. In most cases, this behaviour will pass in time. For those with gender dysphoria, it continues through to adulthood.
• 1st outline of bio expl. for gender dysphoria - too much too little testosterone


  One biological explanation proposes that the release of too much or too little testosterone in the womb could lead to gender dysphoria. This is because too much testosterone in the womb could lead to female fetuses being over exposed to testosterone. This can masculinise their brain, later leading to a masculine gender identity. too little testosterone in the womb - lead to male fetuses under exposed to testosterone. fem theri brain.leading to a feminine gender identity.
• An alternative biological explanation - DG

  proposes that the size of an individual’s BSTc (a brain structure) could lead to gender dysphoria as it has been found to correlate with individual’s psychological identify as being either a man or a woman.

  This is because males typically have larger BSTc volumes and this has also been found in female-to-male transgender individuals, hence explaining why they identify as a man. Meanwhile, females typically have smaller BSTc volumes and this has been found in male-to-female transgender individuals, hence explaining why they identify as a woman.
• strength of biological explanations for gender dysphoria is that they have received supporting evidence.

  E.g. research investigating male-to-female transgender individuals have found that they are more likely to have a gene that reduces the ability of testosterone binding to its receptors. In turn, this leads to less testosterone activity. This is a strength because it shows how atypical hormone activity (e.g. less testosterone) may lead to gender dysphoria (e.g. a man identifying as a woman). Therefore adds credibility.
• strength of biological explanations for gender dysphoria is that there is supporting evidence from twin studies.

  E.g. twin studies have found a higher concordance rate of gender dysphoria in MZ twins who share 100% of their genes in comparison to DZ twins who share 50% of their genes. This is a strength because it suggests a genetic and thus biological component to gender dysphoria. Therefore adds credibility.
• limitation of biological explanations for gender dysphoria is that supporting evidence from twin studies suffer from confounding variables.

  MZ twins are more likely to share similar environmental experiences than DZ twins due to always being of the same sex and looking more alike. This means that their higher concordance rate for gender dysphoria could be due to social factors (such as the gender-related behaviours they have observed and imitated or the gender-related behaviours they have been reinforced/punished for) rather than biological factors such as their genes. ? credibility.
•  limitation BIO EXPL.s for gender dysphoria difficult to establish cause and effect when comes to role of the BSTc.

  research has shown that differences in BSTc volume in transgender individuals do not typically develop until adulthood despite people reporting feelings of gender dysphoria in childhood. limitation-suggests that changes in the BSTc volume may be a result rather than a cause of gender dysphoria. E.g. participants in the research were transgender individuals who were receiving hormone therapy and so the hormones they were taking could have caused changes to their BSTc. ? cred
•  limitation of bio expl. for gender dysphoria is that they cannot explain short-term experiences of gender dysphoria.

  some experiences of gender dysphoria only last a few years. This is a limitation because it could be argued that the individual’s biology had not changed in the time between when an individual experiences gender dysphoria and when they stop experiencing gender dysphoria. Instead, social explanations are better able to explain such findings – perhaps individuals are punished more for cross-gender behaviour as they age and so they stop displaying it in adulthood. ? cred.
• Outline social explanations for gender dysphoria

  Social explanations for gender dysphoria propose that it is learned through environmental experiences such as operant conditioning and social learning.
• Outline social explanation for gender dysphoria - operant condition

  In terms of operant conditioning, gender dysphoria may be learned when an individual is reinforced for displaying cross-gender behaviour, therefore resulting in them repeating the behaviour again. For example, young boys tend to experiment with wearing dresses and so it is proposed that parents of individuals with gender dysphoria may have encouraged or complimented their sons when they displayed this behaviour, making them more likely to do it again.
• Meanwhile, the social learning theory proposes that gender dysphoria is learned through observation and imitation of cross-gender behaviour. - outline social expl. for gender dysphoria

  individuals with gender dysphoria may have lacked a gender stereotypical role model and so they may have observed and imitated the gender-related behaviours of role models of the opposite gender. This is presumed to occur more in males (e.g. boys being raised by single-parent mothers) as gender dysphoria typically presents more often in boys than girls.
•  strength of social explanations for gender dysphoria is that they have received supporting evidence.

  For example, research into gender-dysphoric boys have found that the majority lack stereotypical male role models. This is a strength because it suggests that individuals can develop gender dysphoria if they do not have any same-sex role models modelling gender- stereotypical behaviours that they can observe and imitate. This therefore adds credibility to social explanations for gender dysphoria.
• strength of social expl. for gender dysphoria - received further SE

  more children than adults are identified as gender dysphoric - in some cases, it is only temporary. strength because social factors can explain the sometimes short-term nature of gender dysphoria - a child displaying cross-gender behaviour is more likely to be tolerated than an adult in that people are more likely to punish adults for displaying gender ‘inappropriate’ behaviour. In contrast, bio expl. would not be able to explain why gender dysphoria is sometimes short term as their biology would not have changed. add ced
• limitation of social expl for GD unable to explain why GD cannot be unlearned.

  being bullied for displaying gender ‘inappropriate’ behaviour does not cause individuals to ‘unlearn’ their GD. limitation because, GD can be learned when individuals are reinforced for displaying cross-gender beh. If this is true, it should be possible to ‘unlearn’ gender dysphoria by being punished for displaying cross-gender behaviour. the strong and persistent desire to identify as the opposite gender despite prejudice and bullying points to a biological rather than social explanation. ? appropriateness.