and UCS (food) over and over until the presentation of the bell alone (now the CS) produced the CR of salivation in the dog The dog had learned via classical conditioning/association that the bell means food is coming.
a starved rat was introduced into the box. When the lever was pressed by the rat a small pellet of food was dropped onto a tray. The rat soon learned that when he pressed the lever he would receive some food. In this experiment the lever pressing
floor of skinner box. As the rat moved about the box it would accidentally knock the lever. Immediately the electric current would be switched off. The rats quickly learned to go straight to the
lever after being put in the box. The consequence of escaping the electric current ensured that they would repeat the action again and again.
this approach also assumes that you have no free will. Behaviourists assume you are completely at
the mercy of your environment- your behaviour is entirely determined by these mechanisms (classical and operant conditioning) which is disputed by many psychologists
Why does the behaviourist approach not explain all behaviours?
The diathesis stress model is the idea that I may be born with a biological predisposition that makes me more or less vulnerable to a certain behaviour (a
gene, perhaps) However my ENVIRONMENT dictates whether or not this behaviour is brought out.