Debates - nature - nurture

• Define the nature-nurture debate

  The nature-nurture debate discusses whether nature (biology) or nurture (environment) is more important when it comes to explaining human behaviour
• Outline nature perspective in psych

  the nature perspective argues that biology is most important so it is consistent with the biological approach in that it focuses on how biological factors influence a person’s behaviour more than environmental factors. Examples of these biological factors include genes (e.g. how an underactive MAOA gene can lead to offending behaviour), neurochemistry (e.g. how high dopamine activity can lead to schizophrenia) and brain structure/function (e.g. how abnormalities in the worry circuit of the brain can lead to OCD).
• A strength of the nature perspective is that it has received supporting evidence.

  twin studies have found that MZ twins (who share 100% of their genetics) have a higher concordance rate for many psychological disorders than DZ twins (who share 50% of their genetics). This is a strength because their higher concordance rates can be explained by the fact they share more similar genetics, thus suggesting biology is an important factor in human behaviour. Therefore adds credibility.
• However, a limitation of the nature perspective is that supporting evidence is at risk of confounding variables

  MZ twins may have a higher concordance rate than DZ twins - more likely to share similar environmental experiences. This is because MZ twins are always of the same sex (unlike DZ twins) so are more likely to share the same friendship groups, experiences etc. This is a limitation because it could mean that their higher concordance rates for psychological disorders can be explained by environmental factors i.e. nurture rather than nature. Therefore questions credibility.
• Outline nurture perspective in psych

  The nurture perspective argues that environment is most important so it is consistent with the learning approaches (behaviourist and SLT) in that it focuses on how environmental factors influence a person’s behaviour more than biological factors. Examples of these environmental factors include classical conditioning and operant conditioning (e.g. how phobias are learned through classical conditioning and maintained through operant conditioning) as well as social factors (e.g. how a dysfunctional family environment can lead to schizophrenia)
• strength-nurture perspective- received supporting evidence.

  Bandura’s bobo doll study involved children observing an adult role model behaving aggressively or non-aggressively towards a bobo doll. Bandura found that the children who observed the aggressive adult were later observed to behave more aggressively towards the bobo doll than the children who observed the non-aggressive adult. strength-it shows how behaviours such as aggression are learned through SL (i.e. observation and imitation), thus suggesting that environment plays an important role in human behaviour. adds cred
•  limitation of the nurture perspective is that there is contradictory evidence.

  Bandura also observed that boys behaved more aggressively towards the bobo doll than girls, regardless of whether they observed an aggressive or non-aggressive role model. This is a limitation because these findings could be explained by how boys have higher testosterone levels – a hormone linked to aggressive behaviour. As a result, biology (nature) may have been more important than their environment (nurture). Therefore questions credibility.
• outline the interactionist perspective in psych

  Given that there is evidence to support the importance of both nature and nurture, many psychologists now take an interactionist approach to explaining behaviour. This proposes that nature and nurture are equally as important as one another and interact to control human behaviour (e.g. the original diathesis-stress model of schizophrenia proposed how a genetic vulnerability [nature] interacts with an environmental stressor [nurture] to lead to the development of schizophrenia)
• A strength of the interactionist approach is that it has received supporting evidence.

  research has found that when no light is perceived by the retina, the SCN instructs the pineal gland to secrete melatonin, thus inducing sleep. This is a strength because it demonstrates how nature (internal body clocks/endogenous pacemakers) and nurture (external factors/exogenous zeitgebers) interact to regulate human behaviour such as the sleep/wake cycle. Therefore adds credibility.
• limitation - interactionist approach - nature and nurture do not always interact.

  the two-process model proposes that phobias are learned and maintained through classical and operant conditioning (nurture) - a bio theory for phobias proposes that some are innate due to our evolutionary past so aim to aid our survival. limitation because it suggests that some phobias may be learned (i.e. as a result of nurture) while others may be innate (i.e. as a result of nature, so may not be as equally as important and interact with one another like the interactionist app. assumes. ? cred.