grossman (2002) - looked at both parents behaviour and its relationship to the quality of children’s attachments into their teens
quality of infant attachment with mothers related to children’s attachment in adolescence but not fathers
BUT, the quality of father’s pay in infancy was related to the quality of adolescence attachments
suggests fathers have a role to do with play and stimulation rather than nurturing
in schaffer and emerson’s study, fathers were the first joint attachment figure and they are important
if they had a good relationship with their dad they would have better relationships in the future
their relationships with their fathers are different as this links to play and bonding whereas with mothers its focus is on nurture
when fathers rake on the role of primary care-giver, they adopt behaviours more typical of mothers
for example, field (1978) filmed 4 month old babies in face to face interaction with primary caregiver mother, secondary caregiver fathers and primary caregiver fathers
caregiver father, like the mothers, spent more time smiling, imitating and holding infants than secondary caregiver fathers
some psychologists are interested in the role of the father as a primary attachment figure whereas others are interested in the father as the secondary attachment figure
those interested in the father as a secondary attachment figure have tended to see fathers as behaving differently yo that of mothers
but those interested in the father as a primary attachment figure have tended to fund that fathers can take on a maternal role
problem - we cannot conclude what the role of the father is as psychologists are not interested in the same question of the father - some look at the father as a primaryattachment figure whilst others look at the father as a secondary attachment figure
grossman found fathers as secondary attachment figures had an important role
however, other studies have found that children growing up in single or same sex families do not develop any differently from those in two parent heterosexual families
socially sensitive - suggests that children may be disadvantaged by particular child rearing practices
for instance, isabella et al found interactional synchrony to be important in infant caregiver attachment
AO3(research findings):
research findings on fathers have been quite inconsistent
research into the role of the father is quite confusing
this means that there is no conclusive findings as the father can either be a primary caregiver or a secondary caregiver
does not provide us with a valid outcome of the what the role of the father is
AO3(fatherless people):
research has found that fathers as secondary caregivers do have a different role to play as they provide playtime
but research has found that children in same sex families and without heterosexual parents they behave the same
therefore there is actually no need for a father role - and their role in not important
this may be deemed as socially sensitive
AO3(women’s expectations):
women are much more expected to be more nurturing
for example maternity leave - they get majority of the time
fathers may now not be encouraged to be a primary caregiver due to gender rules
but also women may be predisposed to having a baby as once a baby is birthed women feel a flood of emotion and rush
the socially sensitiveconclusions may demotivate fathers to not being present in their child’s lives