Today most babies are to be adopted in the first couple of weeks of birth as research shows children and adoptivemothers as just securely attached as non adoptive families
Also has helped children’s homes, making sure caregiver to child ratio is a lot smalller and assigning a keyworker to enable normalattachments to form
This means that children in institutional care have a chance to develop normalattachments and disinhibited attachment is avoided
Evidential basis
Rutters study has fewer confounding variables than other research into the effects of institutionalisation - There were many orphan studies before the Romanian orphans
The children were affected by these confoundingvariables. Rutgers study has fewer confoundingvariables meaning we can be fairly sure that differences in institutionally cared for children are the rest of this type of care (high internal validity)
Lack of longditudionaldata
Too soon to say for certain whether children suffered permanent effects because we only have data on their development up to their early 20s
Due to when this took place, it will be some time before we have info about some key researchquestions - This means the Romanian orphan studies have not yet yielded their most important findings, some children may ‘catchup’ it is an incomplete study for which the findings and conclusionsmay not maintain
social sensitivity
Late adopted children were shown to have lowIQ - this might subsequently affect how they are treated by parents, teachers etc. And create selffulfilling prophecy
However, much has been learned to help institutionalised children. Overall, the potential benefits of the studies probably outweigh the costs