We have the expectation that relationships should be fair
Both partners should get what they deserve from the relationship
If you are putting a lot into a relationship you should get a lot back but if you are not putting much in a small profit is acceptable
What is Equity?
Both partners make a deserved amount of profit, so one partner could gain a lot more than the other but this would be equitable as long as they put in more than the other does
What is underbenefited?
A partner who is giving more than they are taking
What is overbenefitted?
A partner who is taking more than they are giving
What are the consequences of Inequity?
The more inequity the greater the relationship dissatisfaction
This applies to both underbenefitted and overbenefitted partners
How do you deal with inequity?
Behavioural Change - Put more / less into the relationship
Cognitive Change - Change their perception of rewards and costs
Limitation of SET - The 'economic' metaphor is incorrect:?
Clark and Mills - Identified two types of relationships
Exchange relationships (e.g. work colleagues) - Do involve an expectation of profit
Communal relationships (e.g. romance) - Involve giving and receiving without keeping score
Limitation of SET - Not a complete explanation:
Miller
Showed Ps photos of attractive people
The Ps in committedlong term relationships spent less time looking at the picture
This suggests we don't weigh up costs and benefits, or consider alternatives, unless we are already dissatisfied with the relationship
Comparison is a symptom of unhappiness
Limitation of SET - Culture Bias:?
Moghaddam argues that SET only applies to relationships in individualistic cultures
In individualistic cultures it is about what profit YOU get whereas in collectivist cultures they value everyone involved