Who applied Freud’s concept of psychodynamic approach to offending behaviour?
Inadequatesuperego: Blackburn
Maternal deprivation theory: Bowlby
What is the psychodynamic explanation?
A perspective that describes how unconscious forces operate on the mind and direct human behaviour and experience.
When is the superego formed?
Formed in the phallic stage of development when children resolve the Oedipus complex.
What is the superego?
Morality principle, exerts its influence by punishing the Ego through guilt of wrongdoing, whilst rewarding it with pride for good moral behaviour.
What did Blackburn suggest lead to offending behaviour?
Blackburn argued that if the superego is deficient or inadequate then offending behaviour is inevitable because the Id, is given ‘free reign’ and not controlled properly.
Blackburn proposed 3 types of inadequate superegos.
What are the 3 types of inadequatesuperego?
Weak superego
Deviant superego
Over-harsh superego
Weak superego
If same-sex parent is absent during the phallic stage, a child cannot internalise a fully-formed superego as there is no opportunity for identification.
This would make offending/immoral behaviour more likely.
Deviant superego
Same-sex parent is present, but the superego a childinternalised has immoral or deviant values, this would lead to offending behaviour.
E.g a boy raised by a criminal father is not likely to associate guilt with wrongdoing.
Over-harsh superego
An overly harsh parenting style leads to a child with an over-harsh superego which is crippled with guilt and anxiety.
This may drive an individual unconsciously to perform criminal acts to satisfy the superego’s needs for punishment.
How does an inadequate superego effect emotion?
An inadequate superego allows emotional demands to become uppermost in guiding moral behaviour.
How did Bowlby explain how people form meaningful relationships in adulthood?
Bowlby argued the ability to form meaningful relationships in adulthood were dependent upon the child forming a warm, continuous relationship with a mother-figure.
How does Bowlby explain offending behaviour?
Failure to establish such relationship with the mother during childhood means the child is likely to experience damaging and irreversible consequences later on in life.
Such as affectionless psychopathy, characterised by lack of guilt, empathy and feelings for others.
Such maternally deprived individuals are likely to engage in acts of delinquency and cannot develop close relationships with others.
Bowlby’s 44 Juvenile Thieves study
In interviews, he found that 14 out of 44 juvenile thieves were affectionless psychopaths.
12 out of 14 had experienced prolonged separation from their mothers during infancy (particularly during first 2 years of life)
In a non-criminal group, only 2 had experienced early separation.
Bowlby concluded that maternal deprivation had caused affectional and delinquent behaviour in juvenile thieves.
Research support linking offending and the superego
Goreta, conducted a Freudian analysis of 10offenders referred for psychiatric treatment. Results found in all offenders they showed disturbances in superego formation.
Each offender experienced unconscious feelings of guilt and need for self-punishment. Goreta explained this may be a consequence of an over-harshsuperego, the need for punishment manifesting itself as a desire to offend.
Therefore the evidence seems to support the role of an over-harsh superego as a basis of offending.
How is the psychodynamic approach gender-biased?
Freud’s theory assumes girls develop a weaker superego than boys because they don’t experience castration anxiety, so are under less pressure to identify with their mothers.
Based on this assumption, girls should be more prone to criminal behaviour but they are not. Hoffman, found hardly any gender differences in moral behaviour, when there was a difference girls tended to be more moral than boys.
Suggests the psychodynamic explanation may be prone to alpha bias.
Bowlby’s theory is based on an association between maternal deprivation and offending- NOT GOOD
Lewis analysed data drawn from interviews with 500 young people and found that maternal deprivation was a poor predictor of offending and the ability to form close relationships in adolescence. Even if there was a link, we don’t know if deprivation caused the offending.
May be other factors for this link, e.g maternal deprivation could be due to growing up in poverty and this may explain later offending.
Suggests maternal deprivation may not be the only reason for offending behaviour.
Contradictory research for inadequate superego
Kochanska et al found parents who rely on harsher forms of discipline tend to raise children who are rebellious and rarely express feelings of guilt.
If the inadequate superego explanation was true, we would expect harsh parents to raise children who constantly experience guilt and anxiety.
The research questions the link between harsh parenting and the feelings of guilt within a child.