Rusbult's Investment Theory

    Cards (12)

    • According to Rusbult what are the three major factors that maintain commitment in relationship?
      • Satisfaction Level
      • Comparison with alternatives
      • Investment size
    • According to Rusbult what is your Satisfaction Level?
      • People will have a high level of satisfaction with relationships if they have more rewards (companionship, attention, emotional support) and fewer costs (arguments, time)
      • Additionally it is based on what you expect to receive - If you have high expectations your outcomes also need to be high to br satisfied
    • According to Rusbult what is comparison with alternatives?
      • Perceptions of relational rivals or the extent to which the individuals most important needs can be effectively fulfilled outside the current relationship
      • Alternatives don't have to be other partners e.g. better outcomes by spending time with friends or focussing on work
    • According to Rusbult what is Investment size?
      • Refers to all the the things you would lose should the relationship come to and end
    • What are the two types of Investment?
      • Tangible - E.g. The house you bought with your partner
      • Intangible - E.g. The work and effort put in, which friends you get to keep and the memories you both made
    • What is the maintenance of a relationship determined by?
      • Commitment level
    • How can commitment be strengthened?
      • Satisfaction
      • Investment
    • How is commitment weakened?
      • The presence of alternatives to the relationship
    • Limitation of Rusbult's Investment model - Incomplete Definition:
      • Goodfriend and Agnew
      • There is more to investments than just resources you put in
      • Early relationships have few actual investments e.g. not cohabiting
      • Investments made into future plans - They commit as they want to see their plans work out
      • Fails to recognise true complexity
    • Strength of Rusbult's Investment Model - Supporting Research
      • Le and Agnew - Meta Analysis
      • 52 studies from the 70's - 90's
      • 11,000 Ps from 5 countries
      • Satisfaction, alternatives and investment all predicted commitment
      • True for both men and women, across all cultures and for homosexual and heterosexual couples
      • Increases validity
    • Limitation of Rusbult's Investment model - Correlational studies:
      • Strong correlations have been found between all important factors
      • Most studies do not allow us to conclude any of the factors actually cause commitment
      • Could be that increased commitment = increased investment
      • Direction of causality could be reversed
    • Strength of Rusbult's Investment Model - Explains commitment in domestic violence relationships
      • Rusbult and Martz
      • Studied battered women at a shelter
      • Found that those most likely to return to abusive partner reported making the greatest investment and having the fewest alternatives
      • A victim of domestic violence does not have to be satisfied to stay