Perceptual abilities in infants can be inferred from measures such as head-turning, sucking, eye-tracking, heart-rate.
Perceptual development research faces challenges due to attentional and motivational limitations, motor limitations, and linguistic limitations.
Measures for perceptual development include preference method, habituation method, and conditioning method.
Visual perception in infants is approximately 30 times worse than in adults due to a limited field of view, fixed focal length, and no stereoscopic depth perception before 4 months.
Face perception is significant in the infants world as it aids in distinguishing people from other objects, identifying individuals, and interpreting others emotions.
Fantz (1961) argued that there is an innate preference for faces.
Maurer and Barrera found that 2 month-old infants preferred real faces more than complex symmetic forms.
challenges of perceptual development research?
attentional and motivational limitations
motor limitations
linguistic limitations
measures of infant perceptual abilities:
head-turning
sucking
eye-tracking
heart-rate
methods of inferring perceptual abilities:
preference method
habituation method
conditioning method
foetal visual perception
ultrasound studies reveal:
eyelids remain clsoed until week 26
eye movements at 18 weeks
can sense light sone on mothers abdomen. responds by moving and heart-rate increase
newborn visual perception
acuity approx 30 x worse than adult
limited field of view
focal length fixed around 21 cm (muscles controlling lens permit accomodation)
visual acuity
courage and adams
newborn: 30 times worse than adult
2mo: 15 times
4mo: 8 times
8mo: 4 times
faces have great significance in the infants wolrd:
Fantz argued there is an innate preference for faces
perceptual development
face perception
but is there a true face preference, or rather, a preference for stimulus complexity and symmetry
Maurer and barrera: 1 and 2 mos
2mo: preferred real face: more than just preference for complex symmetric forms
1mo: no preference: no support for innate face preference
does the fetus have a representation of the human face?
reid et al - foetus from 29 weeks preferentially turns towards face-like stimulus
can infants recgonise different faces?
pascalis et al
newborns - 4 days old
can recognise mothers face from unfamiliar female face
but not when scarves cover external features of face
pascalis study suggests
newborns learn to recognise faces very rapidly
newborns use external, rather than internal facial features
perhaps newborns cannot use internal face features
slater et al - attractiveness
adult rating face a: 57% face b: 42.9%
same external features, different internal features
suggests newborns are sensitive to internal features
depth perception
arterberry yonos and bensen
5 & 7 MO
2 objects at same phsycial distance monocular viewing
if use pictorial cues, should reach for lower object more often
5 mo: reach for upper and lower equally
7mo: reach for lower 72% of time
use of pictorial cues emerges between 5 and 7 mo
Foetal auditory perception
Much auditory stimulation while in womb e.g. loud external sounds, mothers internal organs, mothers speech
Initially, foetus responds (by moving and increased heart-rate) only to low-frequency range of adult hearing, but this range expands as the foetus matures
Foetal abilities can be inferred from behaviour at birth
Many studies show auditory perceptual development is influenced by auditory experience in the womb
Newborn auditory perception
at birth:
Prefer to listen to people
Prefer speech to other sounds
Respond most to tones
Prefer sounds with a range of tones (like speech)
Newborns will preferentially suck to hear voice recording
Less likely to suck for music or rhythmical non-speech sounds
Speech perception
Evidence that the foetus can learn to recognise the mother's voice
DeCasper and Fifer
Mothers read from story book aloud, often, during final stages of pregnancy.
On the first day after birth, preferential sucking to hear same story read by either
Mother or 2. female stranger
Newborns preferred mothers voice
But all infants had -12 hours postnatal exposure to mother
DeCasper and Prescott - speech perception
2 days olds showed no preference for father voice vs male stranger, despite hours of postnatal experience with father
Infants are sensitive to the phonetic contrasts of all languages
Werker et al
Examined 7 mo old and adult sensitivity to a hindi contrast
Almost all 7mo olds detect change
All native hindi speaking adults detect change
1 in 10 native english speaking adults detect change
Why do infants lose ability to discriminate non-native phonemes?
Perhaps: auditory system develops greater sensitivity to sounds of native-language; allows accurate detection of same phoneme spoken by different people in different ways
Juscxyk et al compared pref. for common vs uncommon phoneme sequences in english (e.g. chun vs yush)
Jusczyk et al compared pref for common vs uncommon stress pattern in english
6 month olds: equal pref
9 month olds prefer listening to native-language speech sounds
Suggests innate speech predisposition; sensitivity to subtleties of native speech sounds improves through experiencemnb
Perceptual development
The newborn is far from incompetent
Infant perception is limited but well suited to needs
Some perceptual abilities may be 'pre-wired': gives the newborn a 'head-start' e.g. evidence for innate sensitivity to faces and speech sounds
Some perceptual abilities are heavily dependent on experience e.g. visual acuity
Perception is well organised at birth, though very different from adult