Save
...
Russia
Part 1 - 1855-94
Section 1 - Political Authority + The State of Russia (1855)
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Alex
Visit profile
Cards (36)
Mid
19th-century
Russia was large but economically
underdeveloped.
The ratio of villagers to town dwellers was
11
:
1.
85
% of the population were illiterate peasants.
Serfs belonged to
village
communes
and
mirs.
Serfs could be owned
privately
or by the
state.
Serfs paid their master through
rent
and
labour.
Masters could
buy
,
sell
and
beat
their
serfs.
Russia was ruled as an
empire
in 1855.
Russia was run by an
autocratic Tsar
.
The Tsar was head of the
Russian Orthodox Church.
The Tsar was believed to have possessed
semi-divine
powers.
Edicts was
law
passed by the Tsar and were passed by the Tsar.
The Tsar could choose his
own
advisers.
Alexander II became Tsar in
March 1855
when Russia was involved in the
Crimean War.
Britain
,
France
and
Turkey
had been fighting Russia in the Crimean War since 1853.
In 1854, Russia lost the battles of
Balaclava
and
Inkerman.
Russia lost
Sevastopol
in August 1855 which was a
major
naval
base.
Russia's final defeat in 1856 highlighted its
reliance
on
serf armies
and
conscripts
and its
economic backwardness.
45%
of Russia's expenditure was spent on the army which suffered from
incompetent officers
,
humiliation
and
increasing serf uprisings.
Before serf emancipation, Alexander II had
travelled
the
empire
,
served
on
his
father's Council of State
and
led
a
Serfdom
committee.
Alexander II believed serf emancipation would
curb tensions
between the peasants and the government and
stimulate
the
economy.
Alexander II's
family
and
leading bureaucrats
believed in the idea of serf emancipation.
Nicholas
and
Dmitri Milyutin
were bureaucrats who believed in serf emancipation.
Alexander II had
political
,
economic
,
moral
and
intellectual
motives behind his
reforms.
Nobility debt
occurred after emancipation because
nobles
shunned
business
and
relied
on
serfs.
Declining incomes were a
political motive
for emancipation.
A
growing serf population
and
inadequate agriculture
caused
declining incomes.
Masters were forced to
mortgage
and
sell serfs
as
security
for
loans
in order to help declining incomes.
An
inability
to
move
to
town factories
and
internal demands
for
goods
being
low
prevented reform among peasants.
Mirs
prevented
experimentation
which prevented reform.
Rural poverty
after
emancipation
led to a state debt of
54 million roubles.
Westernisers believed that Russia should abandon serfdom.
Slavophiles believed that
serfdom
should only be
reformed
and that Russia should stay as a
traditional peasant
society.
Intellectuals believed that the Russian serfs were treated like
animals.
Nihilists believed that all tradition should be
swept
away.
John Gooding in the mid-19th century said Russia "was more
backwards
now than at the
beginning
of the century".