a system for dealing with offending behaviour which focuses on the rehabilitation of offenders through reconciliation with victims.
This enables an offender to see the impact of their crime and serves to empower the victim by giving them a voice
Changing the emphasis
Historically, a person convicted of a criminal offence would have been regarded as committing a crime against the state
In contrast restorative justice programmes switch it to the needs of the individual victim
This method seeks to be a healing process, Braithwaite'crime hurts so justice should heal'
Restorative justice is more about 'reparation' (repairing the harm they have caused), rather than 'retribution' (punishment)
Restorative justice aims to focus on 2 things
victim of the crime and their recovery
The offender and their recovery/rehabilitation
Key features of the programme
Trained mediator to supervise meetings
Non-courtroom setting where the offendervoluntarily meets victim
can be face to face or online video
victim confronts offender and explains the effect the incident had on them. Enables offender to comprehend the emotional distress caused
Important that it is active involvement from both parties
Focus on positive outcomes for both
Others effected by the crime, family/friends may have a role in the process
Sentencing and restitution
Restorative justice may occur pre trial
Can also function alongside a prison sentence or as an alternative to prison
Or as an incentive to reduce the length of a sentence
In a traditional sense restitution is often seen as a momentary payment by an offender to the survivor for the harm resulting from the offence e.g financial payment for damage caused, or the offender repairing the damage to the property themselves
The offender can then help support the healing process of the victim
Restorative justice council
An independent body whose role is to establish clear standards for the use of restorative justice
Supports its victims in a specialist professionals field
RJC advocates for its use outside of crime, for example preventing and managing conflict in schools, work places etc
A03: Evidence suggests as positive outcomes(+)
Restorative Justice Council reported the results of a major seven year research project
85% of survivors reported satisfaction with the process of meeting the offender face to face
78% would recommend it to other people in a similar situation
60% of the survivors felt the process had made them feel better about the incident enabling them to feel closure
only 2% percent said it made them feel worse
This suggests restorative justice achieves its aims and helps survivors of crime cope with the incident
CC: Not all research is positive
Researchers argue that restorative processes are not as survivor-focused as often reported in satisfaction surveys.
Researchers say that restorative justice processes can become distorted, such as when survivors of crime are used as a way of helping to rehabilitate offenders, rather than being helped themselves
This suggests that the needs of the survivor in restorative justice may be seen as secondary to the needed to rehabilitate offenders
A03: Another strength is that restorative justice does seem to lead to a decrease in rates of recidivism
a meta analysis of 10 studies by Strang et al compared offenders who experienced face-to-face restorative justice schemes with those who had just experienced custodial sentencing
The restorative justice group was significantly less likely to reoffend, this reduction was larger in offenders convicted of violent crime than property
Similarly a review of 24 published studies found lowered recidivism rates with adult offenders especially when using one to one contact with the victim rather than general community involvement
This suggests restorative justice has a positive impact on reoffending maybe more so than other approaches
A03: One limitation of restorative justice is that offenders may abuse the system (-)
the success of restorative justice programmes rely on an offender's intentions being honourable, they must be taking part because they genuinely regret the hurt they caused and want to make amends
However some researchers have suggested that offenders may use restorative justice for all kinds of reasons; such as avoiding punishment or even taking pride in the affect they had on the victim
This will explain why not all offenders benefit from restorative justice and go on to reoffend