p2

• Addressing stereotype threat can help individuals from different cultural backgrounds perform to their full potential on intelligence assessments.
• The bystander effect is a social psychological phenomenon where individuals are less likely to help a person in need when others are present.
• The bystander effect is about inaction in the face of an emergency.
• The more people present, the less likely any one person is to take action.
• The Kitty Genovese Case brought the Bystander Effect to public attention.
• Kitty Genovese was brutally attacked and killed in 1964 in NYC, although numerous neighbors reportedly witnessed the event, yet did not intervene or call for help.
• Diffusion of responsibility is a factor that affects the bystander effect.
• People feel less responsible to take action when others are present, as exemplified in the "someone else will do it" mentality.
• Pluralistic ignorance is a factor that affects the bystander effect.
• Assuming others know better, and no one takes action, can lead to inaction, as seen in the case of not reacting to an emergency because others appear calm.
• Social influence is a factor that affects the bystander effect.
• Conforming to the behavior of others can lead to inaction, as seen in the case of avoiding taking action for fear of being judged or standing out.
• Ambiguity of the situation is a factor that affects the bystander effect.
• Unclear signals or hesitation can lead to inaction, as seen in the case of not helping because it's unclear if help is really needed.
• In some cultures, it may be considered more intelligent to be reserved and humble, while in others, assertiveness and self-promotion may be seen as signs of intelligence.
• Cultural expectations and norms can influence how individuals express their intelligence in different ways.
• In American culture, assertiveness and self-promotion are often seen as signs of intelligence and self-confidence.
• In Japanese culture, humility and modesty are highly valued, and expressing one's intelligence overtly or being boastful about one's accomplishments is often discouraged.
• Cultural perspectives on gender roles can impact how intelligence is perceived, with some cultures influencing expectations about the kinds of intelligence men and women are encouraged to develop.
• High-context cultures, such as those in many Asian and Middle Eastern countries, place importance on indirect and non-verbal communication, while low-context cultures, like many in Western societies, prioritize clear and explicit communication.
• Cultures can be broadly categorized as collectivist or individualist, with collectivist cultures perceiving intelligence as a group-oriented skill, such as harmonious social interactions, cooperation, and loyalty, and individualist cultures emphasizing personal achievements and autonomy.
• Educational systems are heavily influenced by cultural perspectives on intelligence, with some cultures placing a strong emphasis on rote memorization and standardized testing, while others may value creative problem-solving, critical thinking, and collaboration.
• The language and communication styles within a culture can also influence how intelligence is perceived, with some languages having specific vocabulary or expressions related to certain forms of intelligence.
• Measuring intelligence across cultures is a complex endeavor due to the cultural diversity and variations in how intelligence is perceived and expressed, but valid and fair assessments of intelligence in different cultural contexts can be achieved through cultural fairness, test adaptation, and bilingual assessments.
• In individualist Western cultures, individual achievements and innovative thinking are highly valued, and expressing intelligence through personal accomplishments, self-assertion, and unique problem-solving may be seen as signs of intelligence.
• In collectivist cultures like China, group harmony and modesty are emphasized, and overt displays of intelligence may be seen as disruptive or boastful.
• Cultural norms can impact social interactions and evaluations of intelligence.
• The bystander effect was highlighted in the 2012 Aurora Theater Shooting, where some witnesses reported that they hesitated to react because they assumed someone else had already called for help or that the chaos was part of the movie experience.
• The bystander effect was also highlighted in the Drowning Child in a Pool study, where the likelihood of someone offering help decreased as the number of potential witnesses increased.
• The bystander effect was highlighted in the Stabbing in a Convenience Store case, where several customers entered the store, saw the incident, and left without assisting or calling the police.
• Intelligence is a multifaceted and complex psychological construct that encompasses the ability to acquire, process, and apply knowledge.
• IQ tests are among the most common and historically significant intelligence tests, designed to measure a person's cognitive abilities in various domains, including logical reasoning, problem-solving, memory, and verbal comprehension.
• Test administrators and assessors should undergo cross-cultural training to reduce bias, increase awareness of cultural differences, and enhance the validity of the assessment process.
• Incorporating qualitative assessments alongside quantitative measures can provide a more comprehensive view of intelligence.
• Dynamic assessment approaches, which evaluate an individual's potential to learn and adapt, can be more culturally sensitive than traditional static tests.
• In some cultures, traditional paper-and-pencil tests may not be the most suitable method for measuring intelligence.
• Alternative methods, such as performance-based assessments or observations, might be more culturally appropriate.
• Regularly conduct item analysis to identify and eliminate any culturally biased or unfair test items.
• Cultural awareness, open-mindedness, empathy, cultural knowledge, communication skills, adaptability, patience and tolerance, respect for diversity, and cultural humility are factors that affect cross-cultural intelligence.
• Developing cultural norms for tests within specific populations can help provide a fair basis for evaluating an individual's performance relative to their cultural group.