Resource allocation has tradeoffs between parent and offspring - growth and survival vs reproduction, number and size of offspring, offspring sex ratio
Species either have few big offspring that require a lot of resources, or lots of small offspring with barely any resources
Sex allocation - the allocation of resources by parents to offspring of each sex
If one female is founding the population, it makes sense to only produce one male and lots of females, but more grandchildren are granted if give birth to more males (rarer)
Sex ratio fluctuates over time, as depends on how much it costs to produce sons vs daughters, the rarer sex will do better and be produced more
Fisher: reproductive value of all females = that of all males for equal expenditure - if sex ratio not 1:1 then reproductive success higher for rare sex and are overproduced
Fitness is frequency dependent, as in female biased population males will do better and vice versa
Unequal costs, as when males cost less to produce ESS is not 1:1 as it requires equal investment in the 2 sexes, 2:1 is ESS sex ratio biased in favour of cheaper sex
Fitness of sons and daughters varies with mother's fitness, as male reproductive sex more variable than a females - male competition
Size is more important for males than for females in reproductive success
The more dominant a mother red deer was, the more her sons had reproductive success, and when she was subordinate her sons barely succeeded
Red deer sex ratio is around 55% male biased - dominant mothers will produce sons and subordinate males produce daughters
Women who had children with billionaire fathers had more sons (65% vs 50%)
Mother can adjust offspring sex according to need for help - when helpers rare more of helping sex produced, or fewer if too many helpers competing for resources
In a high quality territory, daughters help and increase parental fitness and sibling survival so mostly females produced
In a lowquality territory, daughters will decrease parental fitness and 80% males are produced