Involves identifying signs that trigger anger as well as learning techniques to calm down and deal with the situation in a positive way.
The aim of anger management is to recognise and manage it.
It helps encourage self-awareness and facilitates rehabilitation.
Cognitive behavioural therapy
Novaco, suggested cognitive factors trigger emotional arousal which leads to aggressive acts.
In some people, anger arises in anxiety-inducing or stressful situations.
based on behaviourism, anger is reinforced by the individuals feeling of control in the situation
Anger management is a form of CBT
How does an individual use CBT in anger management?
The individual recognises cognitive factors which trigger anger and develop techniques which bring conflict resolution without violence.
3 stages of anger management
Cognitive preparation
Skills acquisition
Application practice
Cognitive preparation
Offender reflects of past experiences and considers the typical pattern of their behaviour
Offender learns to identify a situation which triggers anger
If the offender interprets the events irrationally, the therapist will aim to challenge it.
For example, offenders may interpret someone looking at them as an act of confrontation. Therapist will aim to break he automatic response of anger.
Skills acquisition
Offenders are introduced to a range of technique which help deal with anger provoking situations.
Techniques may include:
Cognitive: Positive self-talk to encourage calmness
Behavioural: Assertiveness training in how to communicate effectively.
Physiological: Use relaxation training and meditation to control emotions
Application practice
Offenders are given the opportunity to practice their skills in a carefully controlled environment
For example, acting out a role play which involves the therapist and offender to re-enact scenarios which may lead to anger and violence.
Therapist needs to be brave to wind up the offender.
If the offender deals successfully with role play, they are given positive reinforcement by the therapist.
Positive outcome of anger management with young offenders
Keen et al, studied progress made with young offenders between the ages of 17-21 who took part in a nationally recognised anger management programme.
The national anger management package was developed by England and Wales prison service
Course consists of 8X2 hour sessions over a 3 week period And 1 a month after.
Initial issues was offenders not taking the course seriously, individuals forgetting routines, such as bringing their diary.
Offenders reported increased awareness of anger management difficulties and self control.
Individual differences effect usefulness
Howells et al, found anger management had little impact on Australianparticipants who participated in the programme, compared to a control group. But this was not true for all offenders.
Significant progress was made with offenders who showed intense levels of anger before the programme. Also, offenders who were open to change and motivated experienced similar gains.
Therefore anger management may only benefit offenders who experience extreme levels of anger or ready to make changes.
Expensive
Anger management programmes require the service of highly trainedspecialists who are used to deal with violent offenders. Many prisons may not have the resources to fund such programmes.
Additionally, the success of the programme depends on the commitment of those who participate and could be a problem is prisoners are uncooperative or apathetic.
Therefore, anger management may not work in all prisons.
There isn’t always a link between anger and offending
Loza and Loza-Fanous, found no differences in levels of anger between offenders who are classed as violent and those classed as non-violent.
Additionally, it is unlikely that many offences such as fraud is fuelled by anger. In top-down offender profiling an offender is described as calm at the crime scene. They also suggested anger management programmes provide offenders with a justification for their behaviour,