Cards (8)

  • The consolidation of the Settlement through Visitations (1)
    • Elizabeth's 1559 Church Settlement aimed to create a broadly Protestant Church that retained some elements acceptable to moderate Catholics.
    • Initially, there was calm, but pressure grew from more extreme Protestants, especially in London and the south-east.
    • Visitations (inspections) were set up by a Commission for the province of Canterbury to enforce the 1559 Injunctions.
    • Though the Injunctions were moderate, the Visitations were harsher — carried out mostly by Protestant reformers.
    • Visitors examined clergy beliefs and practices, often taking immediate action, including destroying altars, images, and vestments.
  • The consolidation of the Settlement through Visitations (2)
    • Many bishops believed the 1559 Settlement was temporary and sought to embed Protestant theology firmly.
    • Between 1559 and 1564, around 400 clergy resigned or were removed for refusing the Settlement.
    • Conflict arose when Elizabeth demanded crucifixes be retained in churches; bishops Jewel and Grindal threatened to resign.
    • Elizabeth eventually backed down, showing the divide between her moderate stance and her bishops’ Protestant convictions.
  • The vestiarian controversy (1)
    • In January 1565, Elizabeth ordered Archbishop Parker to ensure conformity with the Settlement and 1559 Injunctions.
    • Likely prompted by widespread non-compliance with clerical dress codes, either reported by Parker or discovered independently by Elizabeth.
    • Parker issued the 1566 Advertisements, outlining rules on doctrine, sacraments, and clerical dress:
    • Baptism must use a font, not a basin.
    • Communion given while kneeling.
    • Surplice to be worn for services.
    • Biretta to be worn outside church (hat allowed for long travel).
    • Cathedral clergy to wear vestments appropriate to rank.
    • These rules were a compromise — not as strict as the queen wanted, but still controversial for many radical Protestants.
  • The vestiarian controversy (2)
    • In March 1566, Parker summoned 110 London clergy to demonstrate correct dress37 refused to comply and were suspended.
    • Objections were theologicalradical clergy rejected any clerical dress that implied separation from the laity or retained Catholic symbolism.
    • Pamphlets soon circulated citing biblical opposition to surplices.
    • The core issue became monarchical authority in religious matters — Puritans questioned if the monarch could dictate religious practices.
    • Threat of a Church schism emerged, with some radicals considering separation.
  • The vestiarian controversy (3)
    • Anabaptists (radicals who rejected state authority over the Church) posed a growing threat:
    • Believed only the “Elect” were saved (predestination).
    • Rejected tithes, monarchy, military service, and private property.
    • Practiced adult baptism and polygamy.
    • Known for violent takeover of Münster in the 1530s.
    • Parker urged Elizabeth to formally enforce the Advertisements — she refused.
    • Possible reasons for refusal:
    • Avoid escalation with extreme Protestants.
    • Formal enforcement would require trials by Queen or Privy Councilpolitically risky.
    • Parker, having already compromised with radical clergy, was left to manage the controversy alone.
  • The acquiescence of Catholics (1)
    • Catholicism was not eradicated after the 1559 Settlement.
    • The original enforcement Commission only covered Canterbury province — many areas went untouched.
    • Although Marian bishops and some London clergy were removed, many parish priests (out of ~8000) retained Catholic sympathies.
    • Nicholas Sander claimed fewer than 1 in 100 English were truly Protestant (possibly exaggerated).
    • Different types of Catholics post-1559:
    • Traditional priests retaining pre-Reformation rites.
    • Church papistsloyal to Catholic beliefs but attended Anglican services.
    • Recusantsrefused to attend Anglican services and supported papal authority.
  • The acquiescence of Catholics (2)
    • Evidence of ongoing Catholic practices:
    • In East Riding (Yorkshire): Masses for the dead, religious images, Five Wounds banner (linked to Pilgrimage of Grace).
    • Lancashire and Cheshire: Rood lofts retained, English Bibles lacking, sacrament still placed in mouths.
    • Catholicism survived in remote areas and places with conservative traditions or poor Church infrastructure.
    • Local support was crucial:
    • Justices of the peace sympathetic to Catholicism often avoided charging recusants.
    • Noble and gentry influence mattered (e.g. Percys in Durham, Earl of Arundel in Sussex).
  • The acquiescence of Catholics (3)
    • Most Catholics conformed outwardly — they didn’t openly challenge Elizabeth or refuse attendance unless necessary.
    • Elizabeth herself helped preserve this situation:
    • Refused to administer second Oath of Supremacy, avoiding death penalties.
    • No one executed for saying Mass, despite it being illegal.
    • Lacked resources to crack down on widespread Catholicism, especially in the north.
    • Heavy - handed action could have caused political unrest.
    • Foreign diplomacy also influenced leniency:
    • Pope Pius IV (1559–65) believed England could return peacefully to Rome.
    • Spain urged the Pope not to intervene directly.
    • Turning point: Mary, Queen of Scots fled to England in 1568.
    • Her presence as a Catholic alternative to Elizabeth shifted the landscape, increasing concerns about Catholic loyalty.