Bowlby research

Cards (34)

  • (M) What did Bowlby investigate?
    The relationship between disrupted childhood development and juvenile thieves (maternal deprivation)
  • (M) What research method did Bowlby use?
    Case studies:
    • Interviews
    • Secondary data (medical + school reports)
  • (M) Who were the research participants?
    44 children (31 boys & 13 girls):
    • Attended the London Child Guidance Clinic (LCGC)
    • Described as 'thieves'
    • Many were too young to be charged in court
    • Aged between 5 and 17
  • (M) What were the 5 grades of participants?
    • Grade I (one theft): consisted of 3 children
    • Grade II (a few thefts): consisted of 8 children
    • Grade III (persistent but irregular mild pilfering over a long period): consisted of 10 children
    • Grade IV (chronic and serious thieving for lengthy periods): consisted of 23 children
  • (M) What were the ways that the children were distributed?
    • Grades
    • Age
    • Intelligence
    • Character type
  • (M) What were the character types?
    • Emotionally normal
    • Depressed
    • Circular
    • Hyperthymic
    • Affectionless
    • Schizoid & Schizophrenic
  • (M) What were the IQ scores like in the sample of thieves?
    • The majority of thieves were considered to have average intelligence with 23 having an IQ score between 85-114
    • 2 participants had a score of lower than 85
    • 15 participants scored higher than 114
  • (M) Who were the control group?
    • 44 children
    • Matched on gender, age and IQ
    • 34 boys, 10 girls
    • Were considered emotionally disturbed, but did not steal
  • (M) Was Bowlby's study matched pairs?
    No- it isn't an experiment
  • (M/P) How were the mothers of the children involved?
    Mothers of all 88 children involved were interview to provide a case history of the children's lives
  • (M) What sample was used to obtain the children?
    Opportunity sample
  • (P) What happened when the children first arrived at the clinic?
    • Initial examination was given to each child on arrival to the clinic
    • Stanford-Biret test used to assess their intelligence
  • (P) What was the role of the psychologist?
    • Gave children IQ test
    • Noted the child's emotional attitude
    • Reported findings to Bowlby
  • (P) What was the role of the social worker?
    • Interviewed the mothers & recorded detail of their child's early psychiatric history
    • Reported to Bowlby
    • Met up with the children's mothers for 6 months or more during the study to talk over their issues
  • (P) What was the role of the psychiatrist?
    • Interviewed the child and mother
    • For a period of 6 months or more during the study, the psychiatrist met up weekly with the child
  • (F) Why did Bowlby distinguish between character types?
    To determine what previous factors might have caused the children to steal
  • (F) What were 'affectionless' thieves?
    Children characterized by lack of normal affection, shame or sense of responsibility
  • (F) What did Bowlby discover about 'affectionless' thieves?
    • They appeared to show a pattern in relation to delinquency
    • 14 of the 44 thieves were 'affectionless'
    • Had a lack of affection or warmth of feeling for anyone
  • (F) What behaviours do affectionless thieves show?
    • The children, since infancy, had been 'solitary, undemonstrative and unresponsive'
    • Responsive to neither kindness nor punishment
  • (F) What kind of relationships did 'affectionless' thieves make with others?
    • The majority went out and stole alone
    • Some were members of a gang --> however, they has no emotional ties with these other children
  • (F) How did the 'affectionless' thieves differ?
    • Some were unsociable and apathetic
    • A large number were energetic and active
    • Many of the more active children were aggressive and bullying
  • (F) How/what did Charles K steal?
    • Money and food from home for at least 5 years before being referred
    • Sometimes useless things, such as a tin of baking powder
  • (F) What was Charles K's relationship with his mother?
    • Mother was often away at work --> his grandma looked after him and his brothers
    • Mother was nice; father was psychotic & violent
    • His brother had died when Charles was an infant --> mother was upset & emotionally neglected Charles whilst mourning
  • (F) What was Charles K's personality like?
    • Quiet, reserved, unsociable --> made no friends
    • Showed no affection to either parent
    • Amenable & willing to help at home
    • Well-behaved at old school; truanted at old one due to bullying
  • (F) How many children experienced frequent separation from their mothers?
    12 of the 14 affectionless children:
    • Derek B --> 9 months in hospital as an infant with no visit from either parent
    • Betty I --> spent time in foster homes from 9 months old
    5 out of 30 thieves in other personality categories
    2 in the control group
  • (F) Describe home environments of the children with no frequent separation from their mothers?
    • Several children were unwanted
    • Anxious, unstable and nagging mothers were frequent
    • A few children had fathers who outright hated them
  • (F) How many affectionless thieves were in Grade IV?
    13 out of 14
  • (F) How many affectionless thieves were in the control group?
    0
  • (C) What is a conclusion of Bowlby's study?
    Bowlby is doubtful a law-abiding affectionless character exists:
    • 'It is probably true to say that the affectionless character always steals and usually becomes a recidivist (reoffender)
  • (C) What is a conclusion of Bowlby's study?
    The affectionless thieves have a 'remarkably distinctive early history- prolonged separations from their mothers or foster mothers'
  • (C) What is a conclusion of Bowlby's study?
    Children who steal persistently are of an affectionless character, which has resulted from them having suffered prolonged separation from their mothers during childhood
  • (C) What is a conclusion of Bowlby's study?
    • Bowlby concluded that the children would not have become offenders if they had not had experiences that were harmful to healthy development
    • Bowlby's findings supported the psychodynamic view that early experiences are vital in later development
  • (C) What is a conclusion of Bowlby's study?
    • Bowlby proposed that damage to the emotional development would affect the development of the personality leading to reduced sense of what is right and wrong
    • This research places emphasis on psychoanalytical factors affecting the likelihood of juvenile delinquency
  • (C) What is a conclusion of Bowlby's study?
    • Bowlby stated that there are many children over the age of 4 and 5 who are adaptable and do adjust to adverse circumstances
    • Unsatisfactory environments in early years are compatible with both social and anti-social behaviour, so the answer must lie in the character development in the first few years of life
    • It may well be adverse environment in early years that is responsible for the emotional disturbance and delinquent reaction of these children