The relationship between disrupted childhood development and juvenile thieves (maternal deprivation)
(M) What research method did Bowlby use?
Case studies:
Interviews
Secondary data (medical + school reports)
(M) Who were the research participants?
44 children (31 boys & 13 girls):
Attended the London Child Guidance Clinic (LCGC)
Described as 'thieves'
Many were too young to be charged in court
Aged between 5 and 17
(M) What were the 5 grades of participants?
Grade I (one theft): consisted of 3 children
Grade II (a few thefts): consisted of 8 children
Grade III (persistent but irregular mild pilfering over a long period): consisted of 10 children
Grade IV (chronic and serious thieving for lengthy periods): consisted of 23 children
(M) What were the ways that the children were distributed?
Grades
Age
Intelligence
Character type
(M) What were the character types?
Emotionally normal
Depressed
Circular
Hyperthymic
Affectionless
Schizoid & Schizophrenic
(M) What were the IQ scores like in the sample of thieves?
The majority of thieves were considered to have average intelligence with 23 having an IQ score between 85-114
2 participants had a score of lower than 85
15 participants scored higher than 114
(M) Who were the control group?
44 children
Matched on gender, age and IQ
34 boys, 10 girls
Were considered emotionally disturbed, but did not steal
(M) Was Bowlby's study matched pairs?
No- it isn't an experiment
(M/P) How were the mothers of the children involved?
Mothers of all 88 children involved were interview to provide a case history of the children's lives
(M) What sample was used to obtain the children?
Opportunity sample
(P) What happened when the children first arrived at the clinic?
Initial examination was given to each child on arrival to the clinic
Stanford-Biret test used to assess their intelligence
(P) What was the role of the psychologist?
Gave children IQ test
Noted the child's emotional attitude
Reported findings to Bowlby
(P) What was the role of the social worker?
Interviewed the mothers & recorded detail of their child's early psychiatric history
Reported to Bowlby
Met up with the children's mothers for 6 months or more during the study to talk over their issues
(P) What was the role of the psychiatrist?
Interviewed the child and mother
For a period of 6 months or more during the study, the psychiatrist met up weekly with the child
(F) Why did Bowlby distinguish between character types?
To determine what previous factors might have caused the children to steal
(F) What were 'affectionless' thieves?
Children characterized by lack of normal affection, shame or sense of responsibility
(F) What did Bowlby discover about 'affectionless' thieves?
They appeared to show a pattern in relation to delinquency
14 of the 44 thieves were 'affectionless'
Had a lack of affection or warmth of feeling for anyone
(F) What behaviours do affectionless thieves show?
The children, since infancy, had been 'solitary, undemonstrative and unresponsive'
Responsive to neither kindness nor punishment
(F) What kind of relationships did 'affectionless' thieves make with others?
The majority went out and stole alone
Some were members of a gang --> however, they has no emotional ties with these other children
(F) How did the 'affectionless' thieves differ?
Some were unsociable and apathetic
A large number were energetic and active
Many of the more active children were aggressive and bullying
(F) How/what did Charles K steal?
Money and food from home for at least 5 years before being referred
Sometimes useless things, such as a tin of baking powder
(F) What was Charles K's relationship with his mother?
Mother was often away at work --> his grandma looked after him and his brothers
Mother was nice; father was psychotic & violent
His brother had died when Charles was an infant --> mother was upset & emotionally neglected Charles whilst mourning
(F) What was Charles K's personality like?
Quiet, reserved, unsociable --> made no friends
Showed no affection to either parent
Amenable & willing to help at home
Well-behaved at old school; truanted at old one due to bullying
(F) How many children experienced frequent separation from their mothers?
12 of the 14 affectionless children:
Derek B --> 9 months in hospital as an infant with no visit from either parent
Betty I --> spent time in foster homes from 9 months old
5 out of 30 thieves in other personality categories
2 in the control group
(F) Describe home environments of the children with no frequent separation from their mothers?
Several children were unwanted
Anxious, unstable and nagging mothers were frequent
A few children had fathers who outright hated them
(F) How many affectionless thieves were in Grade IV?
13out of 14
(F) How many affectionless thieves were in the control group?
0
(C) What is a conclusion of Bowlby's study?
Bowlby is doubtful a law-abiding affectionless character exists:
'It is probably true to say that the affectionless character always steals and usually becomes a recidivist (reoffender)
(C) What is a conclusion of Bowlby's study?
The affectionlessthieves have a 'remarkably distinctive early history- prolonged separations from their mothers or foster mothers'
(C) What is a conclusion of Bowlby's study?
Children who steal persistently are of an affectionless character, which has resulted from them having suffered prolonged separation from their mothers during childhood
(C) What is a conclusion of Bowlby's study?
Bowlby concluded that the children would not have become offenders if they had not had experiences that were harmful to healthy development
Bowlby's findings supported the psychodynamic view that early experiences are vital in later development
(C) What is a conclusion of Bowlby's study?
Bowlby proposed that damage to the emotional development would affect the development of the personality leading to reduced sense of what is right and wrong
This research places emphasis on psychoanalytical factors affecting the likelihood of juvenile delinquency
(C) What is a conclusion of Bowlby's study?
Bowlby stated that there are many children over the age of 4 and 5 who are adaptable and do adjust to adverse circumstances
Unsatisfactory environments in early years are compatible with both social and anti-social behaviour, so the answer must lie in the character development in the first few years of life
It may well be adverse environment in early years that is responsible for the emotional disturbance and delinquent reaction of these children