Infants are innately programmed to form an attachment
Social releasers
E.g. cooing, crying, smiling, gurgling, looking cute
Elicit a response from the caregiver drawing them nearer to the child in order to nurture and protect them
Aids the child's survival
Critical period
An attachment must be formed before 2 1/2 years otherwise it will not be possible afterwards
If attachment is disrupted or broken during the critical period, then the child will suffer irreversible long-term social and emotional difficulties
Monotropy
Claims an infant displays a strong innate tendency to form a special attachment to one particular adult female (usually the mother) which is unique from any other attachment they make
Internal Working Model
This monotropic attachment creates an internal working model
Forms a template which all later relationships are based on
Leads to the continuity hypothesis - whatever your relationship is like with your parents in your infancy dictates your relationship with others in your adult years
Eval - support for social releasers
Brazelton's 'Still Face' experiment - observed interactional synchrony. Mothers were instructed to ignore their babies signals (social releasers).
Babies initially showed distress and some lay curled up and motionless
Supports Bowlby's idea about the significance of an infant's social and emotional development in prompting a caregiving response and that they must be adaptive behaviours
Eval - evidence to support IWM and the continuity hypothesis
Bailey (2007) - assessed 99 mothers of one year old babies on their attachment to their own mothers (using a standard interview)
Then measured babies attachment to their mothers
Found that mothers who reported poor quality attachments with their own mothers were much more likely to have their children classified as poor by the observation
Suggests early attachments do form a template for later attachments
Eval - not a universal finding
If there are correlations between child and adult attachments, there are other ways to explain this e.g. the temperament hypothesis
Suggested that some children are simply more likeable, therefore making it easier for the adult to form a relationship with that child
Not due to the parents sensitivity but due to the child's temperament of the child as they are simply more appealing
Makes them appealing to other adults as they grow up
Eval - shortcomings of concept of monotropy
Schaffer and Emerson - 27% joint first in early stages of attachment suggesting that infants do not need to develop one key monotropic relationship for attachment
Eval - social sensitivity
Highlighting importance of primary caregiver places a burden on mothers - sets them up for blame if anything goes wrong and forces them into lifestyle choices
However, not intention - Bowlby wanted to boost the status of women by showing their importance
Before Bowlby's time, custody disputes settled in favour of the father
Also practical application e.g. the importance of key workers like nursery nurses