6.3 Examining the Use of Evidence and Reasoning

    Cards (66)

    • In rhetorical argumentation, evidence refers to the facts, data, examples, or other information used to support a claim or argument
    • Match the type of evidence with its description:
      Factual Evidence ↔️ Objective data, statistics, or verifiable information
      Anecdotal Evidence ↔️ Personal experiences, observations, or case studies
    • Evidence must be credible and relevant to be effective in supporting an argument.

      True
    • Match the type of evidence with its description:
      Factual Evidence ↔️ Objective data, statistics, or other verifiable information
      Anecdotal Evidence ↔️ Personal experiences, observations, or case studies
      Expert Testimony ↔️ Statements or insights from credible sources
    • When analyzing the effectiveness of evidence, consider its credibility, relevance, and sufficiency
    • Weak evidence can undermine the credibility of an argument.
      True
    • Match the type of evidence with its description:
      Factual Evidence ↔️ Objective data, statistics, or other verifiable information
      Anecdotal Evidence ↔️ Personal experiences, observations, or case studies
      Expert Testimony ↔️ Opinions, statements, or insights from credible sources
    • When analyzing the effectiveness of evidence, consider its credibility, relevance, and sufficiency
    • Some common patterns of reasoning include deductive, inductive, causal, and analogical
    • Inductive reasoning builds a general conclusion from specific observations or examples
    • Analyzing patterns of reasoning can reveal the underlying logic
    • Deductive reasoning starts with a general premise and logically deduces a specific outcome
    • Ad hominem involves attacking the person making the argument rather than the argument itself.

      True
    • The slippery slope fallacy argues that a small first step will inevitably lead to disastrous consequences.

      True
    • In rhetorical argumentation, evidence is used to support a claim
    • Anecdotal evidence refers to personal experiences or case
    • Expert testimony involves statements from credible sources.

      True
    • When analyzing the effectiveness of evidence, consider its credibility, relevance, and sufficiency
    • Factual data from reputable sources is considered highly credible evidence.

      True
    • Credible evidence comes from reliable sources and logically supports the argument
    • What does deductive reasoning involve in rhetorical analysis?
      Applying general principles
    • Match the pattern of reasoning with its description:
      Deductive Reasoning ↔️ General to specific
      Inductive Reasoning ↔️ Specific to general
      Causal Reasoning ↔️ Cause-and-effect relationships
      Analogical Reasoning ↔️ Drawing comparisons
    • Causal reasoning establishes a cause-and-effect relationship
    • Inductive reasoning provides certain conclusions if the premises are true.
      False
    • Credibility of evidence is essential for a balanced rhetorical argument.
      True
    • What does expert testimony contribute to an argument?
      Professional insight
    • Weak or irrelevant evidence can undermine the strength of the argument
    • Factual evidence is based on opinions or personal experiences.
      False
    • Arrange the following logical reasoning patterns in their logical sequence:
      1️⃣ Deductive Reasoning
      2️⃣ Inductive Reasoning
      3️⃣ Causal Reasoning
      4️⃣ Analogical Reasoning
    • Common logical fallacies include ad hominem attacks, straw man arguments, and slippery slope arguments
    • What is the primary requirement for evidence used in rhetorical texts?
      Credibility and relevance
    • Analogical reasoning involves drawing comparisons to make arguments
    • What are logical fallacies in rhetorical arguments?
      Flaws in reasoning
    • Effective evidence enhances the credibility and persuasiveness of an argument.

      True
    • Expert testimony refers to opinions or statements from credible, authoritative sources
    • When analyzing rhetorical texts, it is important to identify the types of evidence
    • Weak or irrelevant evidence can undermine the strength of a rhetorical argument.

      True
    • Strong evidence enhances the persuasiveness of an argument.

      True
    • When analyzing rhetorical texts, it's important to identify the types of evidence
    • Effective evidence must be credible and relevant to strengthen an argument.

      True