6.3 Examining the Use of Evidence and Reasoning

Cards (66)

  • In rhetorical argumentation, evidence refers to the facts, data, examples, or other information used to support a claim or argument
  • Match the type of evidence with its description:
    Factual Evidence ↔️ Objective data, statistics, or verifiable information
    Anecdotal Evidence ↔️ Personal experiences, observations, or case studies
  • Evidence must be credible and relevant to be effective in supporting an argument.

    True
  • Match the type of evidence with its description:
    Factual Evidence ↔️ Objective data, statistics, or other verifiable information
    Anecdotal Evidence ↔️ Personal experiences, observations, or case studies
    Expert Testimony ↔️ Statements or insights from credible sources
  • When analyzing the effectiveness of evidence, consider its credibility, relevance, and sufficiency
  • Weak evidence can undermine the credibility of an argument.
    True
  • Match the type of evidence with its description:
    Factual Evidence ↔️ Objective data, statistics, or other verifiable information
    Anecdotal Evidence ↔️ Personal experiences, observations, or case studies
    Expert Testimony ↔️ Opinions, statements, or insights from credible sources
  • When analyzing the effectiveness of evidence, consider its credibility, relevance, and sufficiency
  • Some common patterns of reasoning include deductive, inductive, causal, and analogical
  • Inductive reasoning builds a general conclusion from specific observations or examples
  • Analyzing patterns of reasoning can reveal the underlying logic
  • Deductive reasoning starts with a general premise and logically deduces a specific outcome
  • Ad hominem involves attacking the person making the argument rather than the argument itself.

    True
  • The slippery slope fallacy argues that a small first step will inevitably lead to disastrous consequences.

    True
  • In rhetorical argumentation, evidence is used to support a claim
  • Anecdotal evidence refers to personal experiences or case
  • Expert testimony involves statements from credible sources.

    True
  • When analyzing the effectiveness of evidence, consider its credibility, relevance, and sufficiency
  • Factual data from reputable sources is considered highly credible evidence.

    True
  • Credible evidence comes from reliable sources and logically supports the argument
  • What does deductive reasoning involve in rhetorical analysis?
    Applying general principles
  • Match the pattern of reasoning with its description:
    Deductive Reasoning ↔️ General to specific
    Inductive Reasoning ↔️ Specific to general
    Causal Reasoning ↔️ Cause-and-effect relationships
    Analogical Reasoning ↔️ Drawing comparisons
  • Causal reasoning establishes a cause-and-effect relationship
  • Inductive reasoning provides certain conclusions if the premises are true.
    False
  • Credibility of evidence is essential for a balanced rhetorical argument.
    True
  • What does expert testimony contribute to an argument?
    Professional insight
  • Weak or irrelevant evidence can undermine the strength of the argument
  • Factual evidence is based on opinions or personal experiences.
    False
  • Arrange the following logical reasoning patterns in their logical sequence:
    1️⃣ Deductive Reasoning
    2️⃣ Inductive Reasoning
    3️⃣ Causal Reasoning
    4️⃣ Analogical Reasoning
  • Common logical fallacies include ad hominem attacks, straw man arguments, and slippery slope arguments
  • What is the primary requirement for evidence used in rhetorical texts?
    Credibility and relevance
  • Analogical reasoning involves drawing comparisons to make arguments
  • What are logical fallacies in rhetorical arguments?
    Flaws in reasoning
  • Effective evidence enhances the credibility and persuasiveness of an argument.

    True
  • Expert testimony refers to opinions or statements from credible, authoritative sources
  • When analyzing rhetorical texts, it is important to identify the types of evidence
  • Weak or irrelevant evidence can undermine the strength of a rhetorical argument.

    True
  • Strong evidence enhances the persuasiveness of an argument.

    True
  • When analyzing rhetorical texts, it's important to identify the types of evidence
  • Effective evidence must be credible and relevant to strengthen an argument.

    True