Save
AP English Language and Composition
Unit 2: Claims and Evidence
2.2 Evaluating Evidence Supporting Claims
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Cards (88)
What is a claim in an argument?
A statement of belief
The purpose of a claim is to persuade or
inform
Match the type of claim with its purpose or characteristic:
Factual ↔️ Based on verifiable evidence
Definitional ↔️ Clarifies the meaning of a term
Causal ↔️ Explains cause-and-effect
Value ↔️ Expresses opinion about quality
A value claim expresses a judgment about the
worth
or morality of something.
True
Match the type of claim with its characteristic:
Factual ↔️ Verifiable evidence
Definitional ↔️ Clarifies term meaning
Causal ↔️ Identifies cause-and-effect
Value ↔️ Expresses moral judgment
Fact-based evidence is based on objective,
verifiable
information.
True
Arrange the factors influencing source credibility from most to least significant:
1️⃣ Expertise
2️⃣ Objectivity
3️⃣ Currency
4️⃣ Relevance
Currency
in a source refers to how up-to-date the information is.
True
What is the primary difference between a claim and an opinion?
Evidence and reasoning
A claim is based on evidence and logic, while an opinion is based on personal preference.
True
Match the type of claim with its purpose:
Factual ↔️ Establish truth or falsity
Definitional ↔️ Define term or concept
Causal ↔️ Explain cause-effect
Value ↔️ Make judgment about worth
Policy ↔️ Propose course of action
A value claim expresses an
opinion
about the quality or merit of something.
True
What is the key distinction between fact-based and opinion-based evidence?
Objective vs. subjective
Objectivity in a source refers to the degree of bias or
impartiality
What is an example of relevant evidence for the claim that climate change is primarily caused by human activities?
Greenhouse gas emissions
Evidence from an independent research group is likely less
biased
than evidence from a lobbying organization.
True
What are the key factors to consider when evaluating the quality and objectivity of evidence?
Credibility, accuracy, bias
Evidence from a lobbying organization is likely to have less bias than evidence from an independent research group.
False
Potential biases or inaccuracies in evidence can undermine its
reliability
.
What is selection bias in evidence presentation?
Ignoring contradictory evidence
What type of error involves statistical mistakes in data interpretation?
Analytical errors
A claim differs from an opinion because it is backed by evidence and
reasoning
.
How many main types of claims are there in an argument?
Five
What distinguishes fact-based evidence from opinion-based evidence?
Objectivity vs subjectivity
Opinion-based evidence cannot be
definitively
proven true or false.
True
Expertise in a source refers to the author's knowledge, qualifications, and
experience
on the topic.
Why is currency important when evaluating source credibility?
Provides recent and relevant data
Credible sources provide the most recent and relevant
data
Evaluating source credibility helps determine whether evidence is
strong enough
to support a claim.
True
Insufficient evidence may raise questions or leave
gaps
Highly relevant evidence has a direct and clear connection to the claim.
True
Multiple credible studies can provide sufficient evidence for a causal
link
What does 'Accuracy' refer to when assessing evidence quality?
Factual correctness of evidence
What is 'Source bias' in evidence evaluation?
Vested interest of the source
Analytical errors refer to
statistical
mistakes in data interpretation.
True
Data collection errors may arise from issues with sampling, measurement, or
recording
Critically evaluating the quality and objectivity of evidence is essential to determine its reliability
True
What does relevance refer to when evaluating evidence?
Connection to the claim
Assessing the quality and objectivity of evidence involves evaluating its credibility, accuracy, and
bias
Why is accuracy important in evaluating evidence?
Ensures factual correctness
See all 88 cards
See similar decks
2.2 Evaluating Evidence Supporting Claims
AP English Language and Composition > Unit 2: Claims and Evidence
44 cards
2.2 Evaluating Evidence Supporting Claims
AP English Language and Composition > Unit 2: Claims and Evidence
44 cards
2.2 Evaluating Evidence Supporting Claims
AP English Language and Composition > Unit 2: Claims and Evidence
44 cards
2.2 Evaluating Evidence Supporting Claims
AP English Language and Composition > Unit 2: Claims and Evidence
44 cards
Unit 2: Claims and Evidence
AP English Language and Composition
304 cards
2.4 Incorporating Evidence into Writing
AP English Language and Composition > Unit 2: Claims and Evidence
49 cards
2.5 Synthesizing Multiple Sources of Evidence
AP English Language and Composition > Unit 2: Claims and Evidence
92 cards
2.1 Identifying Types of Claims
AP English Language and Composition > Unit 2: Claims and Evidence
39 cards
2.3 Analyzing the Use of Evidence in Arguments
AP English Language and Composition > Unit 2: Claims and Evidence
36 cards
AP English Language and Composition
2399 cards
7.3 Supporting Arguments with Evidence
AP English Language and Composition > Unit 7: Argumentation
90 cards
AP English Literature and Composition
3208 cards
1.5 Recognizing Exigence in Rhetorical Situations
AP English Language and Composition > Unit 1: Rhetorical Situation
40 cards
Unit 8: Research
AP English Language and Composition
232 cards
Unit 5: Synthesis
AP English Language and Composition
368 cards
Unit 7: Argumentation
AP English Language and Composition
304 cards
Unit 4: Style
AP English Language and Composition
272 cards
AP Chinese Language and Culture
1109 cards
5.2 Evaluating Multiple Perspectives
AP English Language and Composition > Unit 5: Synthesis
36 cards
AP Japanese Language and Culture
846 cards
6.3 Examining the Use of Evidence and Reasoning
AP English Language and Composition > Unit 6: Rhetorical Analysis
66 cards