Caregiver-Infant interactions

    Cards (11)

    • What is an attachment?
      An emotional relationship between two people in which seeks closeness and feels more secure when in the presence of the other.
    • What does proximity mean in attachment?
      We stay physically close to those we are attached to.
    • What is separation anxiety?
      When the attachment figure leaves, high levels of distress are shown.
    • What is secure base behaviour?
      Infants regularly return back to their attachment figure whilst playing and exploring.
    • Meltzoff and Moore (1977)
      -Aimed to investigate the aim which imitation occurs within and infant.
      -Videotaped 12–21-day old babies as they watched an adult experimenter pull facial expressions.
      -3 facial expressions: Lip protrusion, mouth opening and tongue protrusion.
      -Found that babies as young as 2 weeks would imitate the adults’ facial expressions.
    • What is reciprocity?
      Mutual exchange of responses between infant and caregiver, back and fourth communication.
    • What is interactional synchrony?
      Temporal coordination between an infant and their caregiver, involves synchrony between infant and caregiver.
    • Tronick et al (1979)
      -Still face paradigm.
      -Mother is interacting with baby, and then suddenly asked to stop interacting with child.
      -When child sees mother is not responding they become distressed.
      -Shows the power that reciprocity and interactional synchrony have on the formation of an attachment.
    • Isabella and Belsky (1991)
      -Studied 153 first time mothers.
      -First observed them when the child was 3 months old, and then conducted further observations up to 9 months.
      -Found that mother and child that had a secure attachment had interacted in a well timed and mutually rewarding manner.
      -Mother and child attachments that were insecure were less synchronised with each other.
      -Shows that interactional synchrony influences the quality of attachment that develops.
    • Meltzoff and Moore: Strengths
      -Highly controlled, recorded from multiple angles.
      -Had another observer who was not aware of the aims of the study.
      -No issues of demand characteristics as working with infants.
    • Meltzoff and Moore: Criticisms
      -Intentionality-Difficult to draw conclusions, as difficult to determine the infant’s intention. So, a researcher would need to make an inference.
      -Bias-observe infants’ behaviour and interpret it in a way that fits the aims. This weekends the validity.
      -Practical issues with studying infants-have to wait for a short time period when the infant is not sleeping or crying etc.
      -Can be socially sensitive-could make mothers feel like bad parents.
    See similar decks