Save
...
3. Metaphysics of God
3.3 Religious language
3.3.1 The verification principle
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Cards (40)
Analytic statements are verifiable by
definition
Match the type of statement with its verification method:
Analytic ↔️ Definition
Synthetic ↔️ Empirical observation
Order the versions of the verification principle from strictest to most lenient:
1️⃣ Strong Verification Principle
2️⃣ Weak Verification Principle
The strong verification principle considers all
non-empirical
claims meaningless.
True
The verification principle is criticized for dismissing valuable insights from
philosophy
and religion.
True
The weak verification principle states that a statement is meaningful if it can be verified in
principle
The verification principle itself cannot be empirically
verified
What is the implication of the strong verification principle for religious statements like "God exists"?
They are meaningless
Religious language is considered meaningful under the strong verification principle.
False
Synthetic statements are verifiable through empirical
observation
Who developed the verification principle?
Logical positivists
What does the strong verification principle require for a statement to be meaningful?
Empirical verifiability
Why does the strong verification principle consider "God exists" meaningless?
Lack of empirical evidence
The
verification principle
promotes clarity and precision in language.
True
How does the verification principle challenge religious language?
Requires empirical evidence
The weak verification principle allows for the possibility that some religious language could be considered
meaningful
The verification principle states that for a statement to be meaningful, it must be verifiable either analytically or
synthetically
What type of statement is "All squares have four sides" and how is it verified?
Analytic, by definition
The strong verification principle rejects all non-empirical statements, including religious and metaphysical
claims
Arrange the criticisms of the verification principle in a logical order:
1️⃣ Self-referential problem
2️⃣ Dismissal of non-empirical knowledge
3️⃣ Difficulty in application
Deciding what is "verifiable" in practice can be highly
subjective
What does the verification principle state about the meaningfulness of a statement?
Empirical evidence is required
What is an example of an analytic statement?
All squares have four sides
A statement that cannot be verified is considered meaningless under the
verification principle
.
True
Religious language is often considered meaningless under the verification principle because it lacks empirical verification.
True
The weak verification principle allows for statements that are verifiable in
principle
The weak verification principle allows for meaningful religious language if it is potentially
verifiable
Why are statements like "God exists" considered meaningless under the strong verification principle?
Cannot be empirically verified
What is one weakness of the verification principle?
Dismisses valuable insights
The verification principle was proposed by
logical positivists
.
True
Why is the verification principle criticized for dismissing insights from philosophy and religion?
Requires empirical evidence
What is an example of a statement verifiable analytically?
All squares have four sides
Match the type of statement with its verification method:
Analytic ↔️ By definition
Synthetic ↔️ By empirical observation
The weak verification principle allows for non-empirical statements to be meaningful if they could potentially be
verified
in the future.
True
What is the self-referential problem of the verification principle?
Cannot verify itself
The verification principle is universally applicable to all types of statements.
False
Synthetic statements are verifiable through empirical observation and
testing
What is the key difference between the strong and weak versions of the verification principle?
Requires empirical verifiability
How does the strong verification principle treat the religious statement "God loves all humans"?
Deems it meaningless
The verification principle rejects valuable insights from non-empirical domains like
philosophy
and religion.
True
See similar decks
3.3.1 The verification principle
OCR A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God > 3.3 Religious language
71 cards
3.3.1 The verification principle
OCR A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God > 3.3 Religious language
40 cards
3.3.1 The verification principle
OCR A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God > 3.3 Religious language
61 cards
OCR A-Level Philosophy
1508 cards
3.3.3 Language games
OCR A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God > 3.3 Religious language
28 cards
3.3.2 The falsification principle
OCR A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God > 3.3 Religious language
26 cards
3.3 Religious language
OCR A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God
94 cards
AQA A-Level Philosophy
1877 cards
3. Metaphysics of God
OCR A-Level Philosophy
316 cards
4. Metaphysics of Mind
AQA A-Level Philosophy
548 cards
3. Metaphysics of God
AQA A-Level Philosophy
332 cards
OCR A-Level English Language
1419 cards
3.3.1 Religious Institutions
WJEC GCSE Religious Studies > Unit 3: Study of a World Faith > 3.3 Community and Tradition
63 cards
4. Metaphysics of Mind
OCR A-Level Philosophy
274 cards
3.2.1 Understanding low-level languages:
Edexcel GCSE Computer Science > Topic 3: Computers > 3.2 Characteristics of Programming Languages
36 cards
OCR A-Level Mathematics
1577 cards
OCR A-Level Politics
2799 cards
OCR A-Level French
2860 cards
Edexcel A-Level English Language
949 cards
OCR A-Level Biology
3977 cards
OCR A-Level Spanish
2348 cards