3.2.2 Teleological/Design Arguments

Cards (35)

  • Teleological or Design Arguments for the existence of God suggest that the intricate order and apparent purpose in the universe point to a divine designer.
  • Teleological or Design Arguments suggest that complex structures cannot arise randomly and must be the result of intelligent planning.
  • The inductive approach uses empirical evidence to infer the existence of God as the designer.
  • Match the approach to teleological arguments with its key figure:
    Inductive ↔️ William Paley
    Deductive ↔️ Thomas Aquinas
  • Both inductive and deductive teleological arguments conclude that complex structures arise through intelligent planning.

    True
  • What alternative theory does Darwinian evolution provide for the complexity observed in nature?
    Random mutation and natural selection
  • Who are two key figures associated with the inductive approach to teleological arguments?
    William Paley, F.R. Tennant
  • Inductive teleological arguments use empirical evidence from nature
  • Thomas Aquinas is a key figure in deductive teleological arguments
  • Match the approach with its description:
    Inductive ↔️ Uses empirical evidence from nature
    Deductive ↔️ Starts with general principles
  • Paley uses the human eye as an example of complexity requiring a designer.

    True
  • Match the concept with its explanation in teleological and Darwinian terms:
    Teleological Explanation ↔️ Attributes complexity to a designer
    Darwinian Explanation ↔️ Attributes complexity to mutation and selection
  • What three qualities of the universe do teleological arguments focus on to suggest intelligent design?
    Complexity, order, purpose
  • Both inductive and deductive teleological arguments rely on the premise that complex structures arise randomly.
    False
  • What is the main difference between the inductive and deductive approaches to teleological arguments?
    Empirical evidence vs. principles
  • Paley's watchmaker analogy suggests that the complexity and order in the universe point to a divine designer.
  • Teleological or Design Arguments suggest that the intricate order and apparent purpose in the universe point to a divine designer.
  • What is the central premise of teleological arguments for the existence of God?
    Intelligent design
  • Deductive teleological arguments start with general principles about design.
    True
  • Teleological arguments suggest that the universe's complexity implies a divine designer.

    True
  • What is the main idea behind Paley's Watchmaker Analogy?
    Complexity implies a designer
  • Who are key figures associated with Darwinian evolution?
    Charles Darwin
  • What is a significant weakness of teleological arguments?
    Inductive leap
  • Who are two key figures associated with the inductive approach to teleological arguments?
    William Paley, F.R. Tennant
  • The deductive approach to teleological arguments uses empirical evidence from nature to infer God's existence.
    False
  • Which key figure is associated with the deductive approach to teleological arguments?
    Thomas Aquinas
  • Teleological arguments suggest that the complexity, order, and apparent purpose in the universe point to a divine designer.
  • What is the central analogy in William Paley's teleological argument?
    The watchmaker analogy
  • Darwin's theory of evolution supports the premise of teleological arguments.
    False
  • Darwin argued that complex structures arise through random mutation and natural selection
  • Who are key figures associated with inductive teleological arguments?
    William Paley, F.R. Tennant
  • What three concepts are central to teleological arguments?
    Complexity, order, purpose
  • Teleological arguments rely on the premise that complex structures cannot arise randomly
  • Darwinian evolution challenges teleological arguments by explaining complexity through random mutation and natural selection
  • One strength of teleological arguments is their intuitive appeal