Save
...
3. Metaphysics of God
3.2 Arguments relating to the existence of God
3.2.2 Teleological arguments
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Cards (42)
Thomas Aquinas incorporated Aristotle's ideas into his famous "Five
Ways
."
What scientific advances in the 17th-18th centuries strengthened the argument from design?
Physics and astronomy
The argument from contingency claims that the universe's contingent nature requires a necessary and intelligent
cause
There are two main types of teleological arguments: the argument from
design
and the argument from contingency.
Which scientific theory in the 19th century challenged teleological arguments?
Evolutionary theory
There are two main types of teleological arguments: the argument from design and the argument from
contingency
.
True
Thomas Aquinas developed teleological arguments in his "
Five Ways
" to prove God's existence.
True
What is the central premise of Thomas Aquinas' cosmological argument?
The universe requires a cause
Which historical figure influenced Thomas Aquinas' development of teleological arguments?
Aristotle
Which scientific theory challenged the design argument in the 19th century?
Evolutionary theory
Newton's laws of physics in the 17th-18th centuries strengthened the teleological argument.
True
William Paley's watchmaker analogy compares the universe to a complex watch.
True
According to Aquinas, the uncaused cause of the universe is a necessary being, which we call
God
.
The Anthropic Principle suggests that the universe appears designed for life because we only observe universes that allow for our
existence
.
What is the central idea of teleological arguments for the existence of God?
Design points to God
Chronological influence of scientific discoveries on teleological arguments
1️⃣ 17th-18th Centuries: Advances in physics and astronomy strengthen the argument from design
2️⃣ 19th Century: Evolutionary theory challenges the argument from design
3️⃣ 20th Century: Developments in cosmology and biology revive interest
What is the central idea of teleological arguments for the existence of God?
Design implies an intelligent creator
Who introduced the concept of an unmoved mover, which influenced teleological arguments?
Aristotle
Paley's conclusion is that the universe's design and order imply an intelligent creator similar to a
watchmaker
.
True
The universe's order and complexity provide explanatory power to teleological arguments.
True
Phases in the historical development of teleological arguments
1️⃣ Ancient Greek Philosophy: Aristotle introduces the unmoved mover.
2️⃣ Medieval Theology: Thomas Aquinas incorporates Aristotle's ideas.
3️⃣ Scientific Influences: Newton's laws strengthen the argument from design.
4️⃣ Evolutionary Theory: Darwin challenges the need for a designer.
5️⃣ Modern Cosmology: New developments renew interest in fine-tuning.
Which medieval theologian incorporated Aristotle's ideas into his "Five Ways"?
Thomas Aquinas
Phases in the historical context of teleological arguments
1️⃣ Ancient Greek Philosophy
2️⃣ Medieval Theology
3️⃣ Scientific Influences
Aquinas argued that the causal chain of the universe must be infinite.
False
Match the criticism of teleological arguments with a common response:
Argument from Ignorance ↔️ Evidence of design and order
Complexity does not imply design ↔️ Evolution explains biological complexity
Infinite regress ↔️ God is an uncaused necessary being
Anthropic Principle ↔️ Fine-tuning of physical constants
William Paley's watchmaker analogy compares the complexity of the universe to the complexity of a
watch
What is a primary strength of teleological arguments?
Apparent design and order
Teleological arguments attempt to infer the
existence
of God from the apparent purpose and order observed in the natural world.
True
Aristotle introduced the concept of an
unmoved
mover as the ultimate cause of the universe.
What renewed interest in the fine-tuning of the universe in the 20th century?
Cosmology and biology
What is the central premise of Thomas Aquinas' cosmological argument?
Everything has a cause
Teleological arguments have historical influence dating back to ancient Greek philosophy.
True
What do both types of teleological arguments attempt to infer about the natural world?
Purpose and order
Teleological arguments have a long and evolving history tied to
scientific
progress.
True
What does the argument from design claim about the universe?
It exhibits intelligent design
Match the historical period with its key figure and influence on teleological arguments:
Middle Ages ↔️ Thomas Aquinas, Intelligent Designer
17th-18th Centuries ↔️ Newton, Natural Laws
19th Century ↔️ Darwin, Natural Selection
20th Century ↔️ Scientists, Fine-tuning
Steps of Aquinas' cosmological argument
1️⃣ Everything that exists has a cause.
2️⃣ The universe exists, so it must have a cause.
3️⃣ This causal chain cannot be infinite; there must be an uncaused cause.
4️⃣ This uncaused cause is a necessary being, which we call God.
What does the argument from contingency claim about the universe's existence?
It requires a necessary cause
New developments in cosmology and biology in the 20th century renewed interest in aspects like the
fine-tuning
of the universe.
True
Evolutionary theory in the 19th century challenged the need for an intelligent
designer
in the universe.
See all 42 cards
See similar decks
3.2.2 Teleological arguments
OCR A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God > 3.2 Arguments relating to the existence of God
89 cards
3.2.2 Teleological arguments
OCR A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God > 3.2 Arguments relating to the existence of God
42 cards
3.2.2 Teleological arguments
OCR A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God > 3.2 Arguments relating to the existence of God
26 cards
3.2.2 Teleological/Design Arguments
AQA A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God > 3.2 Arguments Relating to the Existence of God
35 cards
3.2.1 Ontological arguments
OCR A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God > 3.2 Arguments relating to the existence of God
54 cards
3.2.3 Cosmological Arguments
AQA A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God > 3.2 Arguments Relating to the Existence of God
35 cards
3.2.1 Ontological Arguments
AQA A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God > 3.2 Arguments Relating to the Existence of God
28 cards
3.2.3 Cosmological arguments
OCR A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God > 3.2 Arguments relating to the existence of God
40 cards
3.2.3.4 Critiques of Cosmological Arguments
AQA A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God > 3.2 Arguments Relating to the Existence of God > 3.2.3 Cosmological Arguments
35 cards
3.2.1.4 Critiques of Ontological Arguments
AQA A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God > 3.2 Arguments Relating to the Existence of God > 3.2.1 Ontological Arguments
28 cards
3.2 Arguments Relating to the Existence of God
AQA A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God
206 cards
3.2 Arguments relating to the existence of God
OCR A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God
147 cards
3.2.5 Religious Language
AQA A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God > 3.2 Arguments Relating to the Existence of God
65 cards
OCR A-Level Philosophy
1508 cards
3.2.4 The problem of evil
OCR A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God > 3.2 Arguments relating to the existence of God
11 cards
3.2.4 The Problem of Evil
AQA A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God > 3.2 Arguments Relating to the Existence of God
43 cards
AQA A-Level Philosophy
1877 cards
3. Metaphysics of God
OCR A-Level Philosophy
316 cards
3.2.4.3 Responses to the Problem of Evil
AQA A-Level Philosophy > 3. Metaphysics of God > 3.2 Arguments Relating to the Existence of God > 3.2.4 The Problem of Evil
43 cards
4. Metaphysics of Mind
AQA A-Level Philosophy
548 cards
3. Metaphysics of God
AQA A-Level Philosophy
332 cards