7.5.3 Peer Review and Implications of Psychological Research

    Cards (85)

    • Peer Review is a process where experts in a field evaluate research before publication to ensure scientific rigor, validity, and originality
    • Peer review ensures complete detection of all errors in research.
      False
    • Why is peer review considered a critical part of ensuring the quality of psychological research?
      Ensuring scientific rigor
    • Steps involved in the peer review process
      1️⃣ Submission
      2️⃣ Editor Assessment
      3️⃣ Assignment to Reviewers
      4️⃣ Review Process
      5️⃣ Feedback to Authors
      6️⃣ Revision
      7️⃣ Final Decision
    • Peer review is essential for preserving the credibility and trustworthiness of psychological science
    • Peer review ensures that research makes a meaningful contribution to the field.

      True
    • Peer review includes quality control, error detection, and ensuring relevance.

      True
    • What is one potential bias in the peer review process related to gender?
      Favoring male authors
    • What is one limitation of peer review in detecting fraud?
      Limited capacity
    • What is the primary purpose of peer review in ensuring research quality?
      Scientific rigor
    • The peer review process typically includes submission, assessment by editors, and assignment to reviewers
    • What is one role of peer review in maintaining scientific integrity in psychological research?
      Quality Control
    • What type of bias suppresses alternative viewpoints in research?
      Theoretical bias
    • Institutional bias in peer review favors papers from prestigious universities.

      True
    • Steps to refine the peer review process
      1️⃣ Implement double-blind reviews
      2️⃣ Provide reviewer training
    • Theoretical implications in research can challenge existing models
    • Match the implication type with its focus:
      Theoretical ↔️ Challenging psychological theories
      Practical ↔️ Improving educational strategies
      Societal ↔️ Informing public health campaigns
    • Match the implication type with its description:
      Theoretical ↔️ Contributes to or challenges theories
      Practical ↔️ Solves real-world problems
      Societal ↔️ Informs policies and decisions
    • Primary purposes of peer review
      1️⃣ Quality Control
      2️⃣ Error Detection
      3️⃣ Improving Research Quality
      4️⃣ Ensuring Relevance
    • Enhanced scientific rigor is one of the benefits of peer review.

      True
    • Stages of the peer review process in psychological research
      1️⃣ Submission
      2️⃣ Editor Assessment
      3️⃣ Assignment to Reviewers
      4️⃣ Review Process
      5️⃣ Feedback to Authors
      6️⃣ Revision
      7️⃣ Final Decision
    • What is the role of peer review in ensuring credibility in psychological science?
      Ensuring relevance
    • What type of bias in peer review favors papers from prestigious institutions?
      Institutional
    • The peer review process, while critical for maintaining scientific integrity, is susceptible to various biases that can compromise the fairness and accuracy of the evaluations.biases
    • One limitation of peer review is its limited capacity to detect fraud
    • Psychological research can have important practical implications that impact people's lives.practical
    • Researchers have a responsibility to ensure their work is not misused or applied in ways that could cause harm
    • Findings that challenged existing models of memory led to the development of a new theory of how the brain encodes information.theory
    • Stages of the peer review process
      1️⃣ Submission
      2️⃣ Assessment by editors
      3️⃣ Assignment to reviewers
      4️⃣ Review process
      5️⃣ Feedback to authors
      6️⃣ Revision
      7️⃣ Final decision
    • Match the benefit of peer review with its description:
      Enhanced Scientific Rigor ↔️ Improves methodology and data analysis
      Reduced Errors ↔️ Catches and corrects flaws in research
      Increased Validity ↔️ Ensures research findings are credible
      Higher Relevance ↔️ Verifies research's contribution to the field
    • Transparency is a key benefit of the peer review process.
      True
    • How does peer review maintain the scientific integrity of psychological research?
      Ensuring quality and relevance
    • Peer review identifies and corrects flaws in the research design
    • Peer review maintains the discipline's high standards
    • Match the benefit of peer review with its description:
      Quality Control ↔️ Assesses scientific merit
      Error Detection ↔️ Corrects flaws in research
      Improving Research Quality ↔️ Enhances through feedback
      Ensuring Relevance ↔️ Confirms meaningful contribution
    • Institutional bias in peer review may favor papers from prestigious universities.

      True
    • Peer review can discourage groundbreaking research that deviates from established norms.

      True
    • Error detection in peer review involves correcting flaws in methodology and data.

      True
    • What decision is made by the editor after authors revise their paper based on feedback?
      Final decision
    • Peer review advances knowledge through a collaborative and transparent process.

      True
    See similar decks