Principle (OLA ‘57)

• What is the section for ”An occupier is a person who would be treated as such under common law“?


  s1(2) OLA 1957
• What is the principle for s1(2) OLA 1957?

  An occupier is a person who would be treated as such under common law
• What is the case for ”An Occupier is one who has a sufficient degree of control over a property“?

  Wheat v Lacon
• What is the principle for (Wheat v Lacon)?

  An Occupier is one who has a sufficient degree of control over a property
• What is the section for ”Premises is any fixed or moveable structure“?

  s1(3)(a) OLA 1957
• What is the principle for s1(3)(a)OLA 1957?

  Premises is any fixed or moveable structure
• What is the section for ”A lawful visitor is a person with Permission to Enter“?

  s1(2) OLA 1957
• What is the principle for s1(2) OLA 1957?

  A lawful visitor is a person with Permission to Enter
• What is the case for ”If the occupier knows that C repeatedly visits the premises, but does nothing about it; therefore, they may be implied Permission to Enter“?

  Lowery v Walker
• What is the principle for (Lowery v Walker)?

  If the occupier knows that C repeatedly visits the premises, but does nothing about; therefore, they may be implied Permission to Enter
• What is the case for ”There ISN’T Permission to Enter if C exceeds their permission e.g. performing reckless and dangerous activities“?

  Harvey v Plymouth CC
• What is the principle for (Harvey v Plymouth CC)?

  There ISN‘T Permission to Enter if C exceeds their permission e.g. performing reckless and dangerous activities
• What is the case for ”The Doctrine of Allurement“?

  Jolley v Sutton
• What is the principle (Jolley v Sutton)?

  The Doctrine of Allurement
• What is the case for ”Entry in order to communicate“?


  Robson v Hallett
• What is the principle for (Robson v Hallett)?

  Entry in order to communicate
• What is the section for ”An occupier owes a duty to take reasonable care to keep the visitor safe“?

  s2(2) OLA 1957
• What is the principle for s2(2) OLA 1957?

  An occupier owes a duty take reasonable care to keep the visitor safe
• What is the section for ”There is a variation in duty for Children“?

  s2(3)(a) OLA 1957
• What is the principle for s2(3)(a) OLA 1957?

  There is variation of duty for Children
• What is the case for ”An Occupier must be prepared for Children to be less careful than adults“?

  Moloney v Lambeth
• What is the principle for (Moloney v Lambeth)?

  An Occupier must be prepared for Children to be less careful than adults
• What is the case for ”An Occupier is entitled to expect parents to take appropriate care of their children“?

  Phipps v Rochester
• What is the principle for (Phipps v Rochester)?

  An Occupier is entitled to expect parents to take appropriate care of their children
• What is the section for ”There is a variation in duty for Specialist Visitors“?

  s2(3)(b) OLA 1957
• What is the principle for s2(3)(b) OLA 1957?

  There is a variation in duty for Specialist Visitors
• What is the case for ”A Specialist Worker will be aware of and protect himself against risks within his own specialism“?

  Roles v Nathan
• What is the principle for (Roles v Nathan)

  A Specialist Visitor will be aware of and protect himself against risks within his own specialism
• What is the case for ”To avoid liability, the Occupier must show that he acted as the reasonable man would have in the same circumstances“?



  Tedstone v Bourne Leisure
• What is the principle for (Tedstone v Bourne Leisure)?

  To avoid liability, the Occupier must show that he acted as the reasonable man would have in the same circumstances
• What is the section for ”D may be able to discharge his duty by providing reasonable warnings, both implied (a locked fence) or express (a notice)“?



  s2(4) OLA 1957
• What is the principle for s2(4) OLA 1957?

  D may be able to discharge his duty by providing reasonable warnings, both implied (a locked fence) or express (a notice)
• What is the case for ”Notices should clearly explain the danger and be visible“?

  Woollins v British Celanese
• What is the principle for (Woollins v British Celanese)?

  Notices should clearly explain the danger and be visible