misleading information

    Cards (16)

    • What is an eyewitness?
      Someone who has seen a crime
    • What does eyewitness testimony involve?
      Recalling details of observed events
    • How can eyewitness testimony be affected?
      By misleading information and anxiety
    • What was the mean estimated speed for 'contacted' in Loftus and Palmer's study?
      31.8 mph
    • What was the mean estimated speed for 'smashed' in Loftus and Palmer's study?
      40.5 mph
    • What does the response-bias explanation suggest?
      Wording influences how participants answer
    • What does the substitution explanation imply?
      Wording changes the participant's memory
    • What did Loftus and Palmer find regarding broken glass reports?
      Those who heard 'smashed' reported more glass
    • What is post-event discussion?
      When witnesses discuss the crime with others
    • How does post-event discussion affect eyewitness testimony?
      It can contaminate their memories
    • What percentage of participants in Gabbert et al.'s study recalled false details?
      71%
    • What was the percentage of false recall in the control group of Gabbert et al.'s study?
      0%
    • What is memory conformity?
      Witnesses go along with each other
    • What are the key terms related to misleading information in eyewitness testimony?
      • Eyewitness testimony
      • Misleading information
      • Leading question
      • Post-event discussion
      • Response-bias explanation
      • Substitution explanation
    • What were the methods and findings of Loftus and Palmer's (1974) study?
      • Participants watched car accident clips
      • Asked about speed using leading questions
      • Mean speeds: 'contacted' = 31.8 mph, 'smashed' = 40.5 mph
      • Leading questions biased recall
    • What were the methods and findings of Gabbert et al.'s (2003) study?
      • Participants watched crime videos from different angles
      • Discussed what they saw before recall test
      • 71% recalled false details from discussion
      • Control group had 0% false recall
    See similar decks