contract law

Subdecks (4)

Cards (307)

  • The law of contract defines the circumstances when promises are enforceable.
  • Not all promises are enforced by courts.
  • For promises to be enforceable as a valid contract, certain elements must be present.
  • The elements of a valid contract are: Offer, Acceptance, Consideration, and Intention to create a legal relationship.
  • The Eurymedon (1975), Lord Wilberforce stated that there must be an Offer, Acceptance, Consideration, and Intention to create a legal relationship for a contract to be valid.
  • 1866Plaintiff discovered the criminal and told the authorities
  • 24 November 1865 – Notice published revoking the offer
  • The offer was made by proclamation, not to the plaintiff directly, and he should have known that it can be revoked in the same manner.
  • The plaintiff was ignorant of the withdrawal but this is an immaterial fact.
  • Dickinson v Dodds – offer can also be communicated through a Third Party.
  • Shuey v US (1875) 20 April 1865 – Proclamation on the giving of reward to catch a criminal
  • Smith v Hughes (1871) stated that if a person conducts themselves in a way that a reasonable man would believe that they are assenting to the terms proposed by the other party, and the other party enters into the contract with them, the person conducting themselves would be equally bound as if they had intended to agree to the other party’s terms.
  • Lord Clarke stated in Flexible Systems Ltd v Molkerei Aloi Muller Gmbh 7 Co (2010) that if the formation of a contract was decided Subjectively, it would lead to much uncertainty based on what the parties thought, the “real intention”.
  • Unless there was a collateral contract with consideration provided to keep the offer open till the time stipulated, the offer will come to an end after the lapse of a reasonable time.
  • The postal rule does not apply for revocation of offers, the offeree must receive the revocation.
  • In an Offer, the Offeror can withdraw or revoke the Offer at any time before acceptance and it must be communicated to the Offeree.
  • In an Offer subject to a condition or event, the offer comes to an end when the event or condition happens.
  • Valid Acceptance in an Offer is when the specified conduct or act is performed by the Offeree.
  • In an Offer, the contract is concluded when the Offeree receives the Offer, regardless of when the revocation is brought to the Offeree's attention.
  • In a Unilateral Offer, the Offer can be revoked even before the time ends, provided the offer is not accepted and the revocation is communicated.
  • In an Offer, there is no need to communicate the acceptance.
  • Hudson suggests that in Reward cases, the Offeror should not be prejudiced by the conduct of the Offeree and further, the Offeror has benefitted from the Offeree's performance of the stipulated act.
  • The death of either party will terminate the offer.
  • Centrovincial Estates v Merchant Investment Assurance Co (1983) stated that the Defendants were bound by the agreement even though they had not reached the agreement before 25/12/1982.
  • A contract is a consensus ad idem – a meeting of minds.
  • The original offer is rejected and is no longer valid.
  • A meeting of minds cannot happen unless there is knowledge of the offer.
  • If there are any variations or if there are new terms added, this would amount to a counter offer.
  • A counter offer is not acceptance and it means that a new offer is being made which has the effect of “killing off” the earlier offer.
  • If one performs the act of acceptance without the knowledge of the offer, they will not be able to sue on the contract.
  • There are two aspects of acceptance: a mirror image of the offer and acceptance must be communicated.
  • Ignorance of the offer can lead to injustice and unfairness.
  • The original offer still stands.
  • More inquiry, asking for more information, would neither be acceptance and neither will it be a counter offer.
  • The Offeree is merely postponing his decision until he receives more information.
  • An offer cannot be accepted in ignorance of the offer.
  • A new offer is being made.
  • A mirror image of the offer is final and unqualified assent to all the terms of the offer.
  • If a particular method of acceptance is stipulated by the offeror in the offer and he states that it is the only method of acceptance, then it must be complied with as that is the only method which will be accepted by the courts.
  • PR can be excluded in non-instantaneous communication.