Save
Social Influence
Resistance to Social Influence
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Hope
Visit profile
Cards (13)
Resistance to social influence
ability for people to withstand the
social pressure
to
conform
to the
majority
or to
obey authority
social support
people who
resist pressures
to
conform
or
obey
can help others to do the same
act as
models
to show others that
social resistance
to
social influence
is possible
Resisting Conformity
Asch
found that
social support
increased
resistance
to
social influence
participants had no support conformity was
32
%
one supporter conformity was
5
%
confederate
acts as a model of
independent behaviour
naive participant free to follow their own
conscience
Resisting Obedience
when participant joined by
disobedient
confederate in
Milgrim’s
study obedience dropped from
65
% to
10
%
the
disobedient
model challenges the
legitimacy
of the
authority
figure making it easier to
disobey
Social Support - Real World research support
Susan Albrecht
et al (
2006
)
evaluated
Teen fresh start USA
, an
eight
week programme to help
pregnant adolescents
(
14-19
) resist
social pressure
to
smoke
social support
provided by
older mentor
adolescents who had a
‘buddy’
were less likely to
smoke
Social Support - Research support for dissenting peers
William Gamson
et al (
1982
)
participants had to produce evidence that would be used to help an
oil company
run a
smear campaign
higher
level of resistance in their study than
Milgrim
found- participants were in
groups
so could discuss what they were told to do
88
% participants
rebelled
against their
orders
peer support can lead to
disobedience
by undermining
legitimacy
of
authority
figure
Social Support - Real World Application
1943
-
German
women protested where
2000 Jewish
men were held
most married to
non-Jewish
partners /
children
of
mixed marriage
women
refused
to
leave
until
husbands
/
sons
released
presence of others helped them
protest
- men released
Locus of Control
internals
(internal
locus of control
) - believe they are mostly responsible for what happens to them
externals
(external
locus of control
) -matter of luck or other outside forces
Locus of Control Continuum
scale
that people
vary
on -
internal
to
external
locus of control - resistance to social influence
high
internal LOC
more able to
resist pressures
to
conform
or
obey
- base decisions on their own
beliefs
tend to be more
self-confident
and
higher intelligence
- less need for
social approval
Locus of Control - Research Support
link between LOC and resistance to obedience
Charles Holland
(1967)
repeated
Milgrim’s
study and measured if participants were
internals
or
externals
37
%
internals
didn’t continue to
highest
shock levels
23
%
externals
didn’t continue
internals showed
greater resistance
Locus of Control - Contradictory Evidence
challenges link between
LOC
and
resistance
Jean Twenge
et al (
2004
)
analysed
data from American LOC studies over a
40 year period
over time span people became more resistant to
obedience
and more
external
if resistance is linked to
internal locus
of
control
more people should be
internal
Locus of Control - Limited role
Rotter
(
1982
)
LOC is not the most important factor in determining whether some
resists social influence
LOC only affects behaviour in
new situations
if you’ve
obeyed
or
conformed
in a
specific situation
in the
past
chance are you will again