behaviourist approach is one of the most influential approaches in modern psychology
there are 4 key assumptions: a central tenet
key assumption 1: all human behaviour is learned from the environment
key assumption 2: psychologist should only study observable, measurable, quantifiablebehaviour
key assumption 3: humans are no different from animals (comparable)
key assumption 4: research on animal behaviour is directly relevant to humans
behaviourists are not concerned with investigating mental processes (in contrast to the cognitive approach)
Watson rejected introspection for being to vague and unmeasurable
behaviourists try to maintain control and objectivity in their research so, in turn, utilised laboratory studies to achieve this
behaviourists suggest all behaviour is learned so their approach falls on the 'nurture' side of the nature-nurture debate (experience rather than biology)
the approach refers to the mind as a 'tabula rasa' meaning their mind is blank at birth and throughout their life the slate is filled and behaviour is shaped through learning and experience
following Darwin, they suggested basic processes that govern learning are the same in all species so in behaviourist research animals replace humans as experimental subjects
Pavlov is one the first behaviourists to explore the relationship between learning and behaviour
Pavlov was a Russian scientists who won the 1904 nobel prize for research into the digestive system of dogs.
pavlov noticed dogs would salivate at the sound of footsteps or the presence of a white lab coat bringing the food, this allowed him to develop his theory of classical conditioning
classical conditioning is a type of learning in which an existing involuntary reflex is associated with a new stimulus
key idea of the behaviourist approach stemming from Pavlov's research: learning occurs through association
Pavlov famously tested his theory using dogs
showed how dogs could be conditioned to salivate to the sound of a bell if that sound was repeatedly presented at the same time they were given food.
-over time, dogs were conditioned to associate the sound of the bell (neutral stimulus) with food (unconditional stimulus)
-this resulted in dogs producing a salivation response (conditioned response) at the sound of the bell (conditioned stimulus) even when no food was present.
-therefore, he demonstrated repeated exposure to an event can come to elicit a new learned response (uncontrollable behaviour) through association
generalisation: conditioned stimulus (bell) could be generalised to other sounds, so the volume or tone could change and still produce salivation, eg: doorbell cause dog to salivate
discrimination: sound becomes too different from the original bell so no salivation occurs; dogs can discriminate between different stimuli, eg: dogs can discriminate between sound of a bell and sound of a phone.
extinction: gradual weakening of conditioned response (salivation on bell). If the conditioned stimulus (bell) continues to be presented but real unconditioned stimulus (food) never appears, association eventually weakens and becomes extinct
spontaneous recovery= sudden display of behaviour that was thought to be extinct, tends to be less strong than the original response given extinction that's already occurred (dog surprises you)
skinner was not a psych but has read work of watson (behaviourism) and pavlov (conditioned reflexes) and developed these ideas saying: stimulus-response association was not enough when it comes to understanding behaviour.
Skinner suggested behaviour is the result of learning through consequences- learning is an active process whereby humans and animals operate on their environment
Skinner conducted research into operant conditioning theory using rats and pigeons, finding 3 types of reinforcement that affects behaviour
reinforcement: a consequence that increases likelihood of behaviour being repeated, help to strengthen behaviour
positive reinforcement: behaviour followed by a desirable consequence (reward) so is more likely to be repeated, eg: praise/ house points in class
negative reinforcement: behaviour is followed by the removal of an adverse consequence and i more likely to be repeated - human/animal avoids something unpleasant and the outcome is a positive experience, eg: competes homework to avoid scolding AND applying suncream to avoid something unpleasant (sunburn negative consequence)
punishment: consequence that decreases the likelihood of behaviour being repeated
a behaviour being followed by an unpleasant consequence and is less likely to be repeated, eg: scolded for talking
skinner created skinner boxes to examine operant conditioning in rats/pigeons
animals would move around the cage and when accidentally activated the lever they would be rewarded with a food pellet, so through positive reinforcement the animal would learn pressing the lever rewards them with food. This supports learning through consequences as the animal learns a new voluntary behaviour which is repeated to receive the rewards
Skinner examined negative reinforcement through an electric shock, showing how rats/ pigeons could be conditioned to perform the same behaviour to avoid an unpleasant stimulus (shock).
extinction: behaviour that was being reinforced stops being reinforced this makes it less likely the behaviour will be repeated and may cease to continue, eg: teacher stops rewarding completed homework so efforts are reduced
schedules of reinforcement impact on how resistant a behaviour is to being extinguished
continuous reinforcement: behaviour is reinforced every time it occurs so over time reinforcement has less of an impact
partial reinforcement: behaviour is reinforced some of the time, compared to continuous it is more resistant to extinction
fixed ratio schedule (more likely to repeat): given after fixed number of response/ behaviours have occurred, eg: rat must press lever 3 times before food pellet is released