Localisation is the theory that specificbrainareas are associated with their own specificbrainfunction
Localisation states that if an area of the brain is damaged so is the function associated with it
Prior to the 19th century studies of the brain followed a holistic theory in which it was assumed that all parts of the brain were involved in all psychologicalfunctioning
4 brain lobes; frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital
the frontal lobe is responsible for higherlevelfunction such as thinking and logic
The parietal lobe is responsible for spatial awareness and touchbasedsensoryprocessing
The temporal lobe is responsible for processing acousticinformation
The occipitallobe is responsible for processing visualinformation
Broca's area is located in the bottom of the frontallobe in the lefthemisphere and is responsible for speechproduction
When Broca's area is damaged it causes Broca'saphasia which is associated with slow, laboured speaking and difficulty using conjunctions in language
Wernicke's area is located in the lefttemporallobe and is responsible for languagecomprehension
When Wernicke's area is damaged it causes Wernicke'saphasia which is characterised by neologisms (nonsensesentences) as words can still be produced but not understood
The motor area is located in the back of the frontal lobe in both hemispheres
damage to the motor area leads to loss of control over finemovements
The somatosensory area is located at the front of the parietal lobe in both hemispheres
The somatosensory area is separated from the motor area by the centralsuculus
the somatosensory area processes touch related sensory information
The amount of the somatosensory area dedicated to a particular body part determines how sensitive it is
The visual area takes up the entirety of the occipital lobe
Each eye sends information from the rightvisualfield to the leftvisualcortex and vice versa
Damage to the rightside of the visualarea causes issues with the leftvisualfield and vice versa
the auditoryarea is located in the temporallobe
Localisation strength; Case study of PhineasGage supports this as after an accident he experienced a huge change in temperament becoming aggressive and shorttempered following an injury to his frontallobe supporting localisation as no other internalmentalprocesses were impacted; HOWEVER case studies are rejected by a nomothetic approach for not being scientific as they cannot be easily generalised to create generallaws of psychology as they only look into extremely rare cases
Localisation weakness; conflicting studies as Lashley (1950) found that removing different areas of the cortex in rats did not impact their ability to learn a maze showing no brainarea as more influential than another in learning suggesting a holistic theory; HOWEVER this study has severe ethical and extrapolation issues
Localisation weakness; Biologicallyreductionist as it reduces complexbrainfunctions that may use multipleareas of the brain at once to onesimplefunction suggesting it does not provide enough understanding of the brain HOWEVER many psychologists favour this as it offers a simplelevel of scientific explanation that can be studied further to be expanded upon by laterresearch
Localisation weakness; theory of plasticity goes against this as it states when one brainarea is damaged another can takeover for it showing that other brainareas can carry out specificfunctions
Localisation strength; Researchsupport from Broca's patient Tan who was examined using postmortemexamination and found that issues with speech production in his life was due to a damaged Broca'sarea; however there are many issues with postmortem examination including ethicalissues as well as low temporal and spatial resolution