Lawful Vistors

Cards (11)

  • Key statutes covering occupiers' liability
    • Occupiers Liability Act 1957
    • Occupiers Liability Act 1984
  • Visitors
    Persons who have express or implied permission to enter the premises
  • Occupiers' liability
    • Comes from both statute law and common law
    • Involves the liability of an occupier to both visitors and persons other than visitors to his or her premises
  • Occupier
    Person who has control over the premises
  • Categories of occupier
    • Tenant of let premises
    • Landlord who retains certain areas of a building
    • Owner who licenses a person to use premises but reserves right of entry
    • Owner of premises where contractors are employed to carry out work
  • Visitor
    Person who has express or implied permission to enter the premises, including those with a right to enter conferred by law (e.g. fire fighters and police officers)
  • Common duty of care
    Duty to take such care as in all the circumstances of the case is reasonable to see that the visitor will be reasonably safe in using the premises for the purposes for which he is invited or permitted by the occupier to be there
  • Application of common duty of care
    • Occupier must be prepared for children to be less careful than adults
    • Occupier can expect a person in the exercise of his calling, to appreciate and guard against any special risks ordinarily incident to it
    • A warning may discharge the duty of care
    • Occupier not liable for fault of independent contractor if acted reasonably in entrusting work and took reasonable steps
  • Reasonable
    Standard of care expected of a reasonable person in the circumstances
  • Children do not form a special category on their own, but the Occupiers Liability Act 1957 s2(3)(a) states that occupiers must be prepared for children to be less careful than adults
  • Cases on occupiers' liability and children
    • Hasledine v Daw [1941]
    • Phipps v Rochester [1955]
    • Wheat v Lacon & Co [1966]
    • Glasgow Corporation v Taylor [1922]