◦ Harmony between the different sectors in society
Aristotle (Plato’s pupil)
◦ There is a need for proportionality and a balance between extremes
e.g. balancing the freedom of expression with protection of the public from hate speech
Aquinas
◦ The constant willingness to deal with other people as they deserve
Utilitarianism – interested in the outcome of an act, regardless of the act itself
For utilitarianists (such as. John Stuart Mill and Jeremy Bentham), maximising happiness is the object of justice
Investigating Powers Act 2016
◦ When drafting this act the government called upon utilitarianism – for the greater good of the country – to achieve justice
◦ The act was met with some criticism surrounding reduction of privacy – one person’s justice is not necessarily another’s.
Distributive justice
Concerned with the fair allocation of resources including antidiscrimination laws, minimum wage and the redistribution of wealth through taxation.
- Human Rights Act 1998
- Equality Act 2010
- Minimum Wage Act 1998
Social justice
Concerned with equal justice, not just in courts, but in all aspects of society.
- People should have equal rights and opportunities , everyone deserves a level playing field
More extreme versions of social justice argue for equality of outcome.
Rawls – liberalist who rejected capitalism
(Rawls) The difference principle – social and economic inequalities may exist but only where they benefit the least advantaged members of society.
(Rawls) Foundational rights – the state must respect the autonomy and rights of the individual
(Rawls) Veil of ignorance
European Convention of human rights
The ECHR is an agreement between 46 countries (member states) to protect specific human rights.
◦ Treaty of London set up after WW2 to prevent against injustices such as the removal of the rights of jews
Rights protected under the Human Rights Act 1998
◦ Right to be free from slavery
◦ Right to a fair trial (Article 6)
◦ Right to education
Section 1 of the HRA says that the articles within the ECHR are now protected by UK law.
Formal procedural justice
Concerned with making and implementing decisions according to fair process.
Article 6 – the right to a fair trial
Means you have the right to a trial that is fair, public and heard by an impartial court within a reasonable time.
◦ Doesn’t give the automatic right to legal representation but there may be a breach if none is given in complex cases
Legal aid
All applications for criminal cases are means tested (standard level of justice). Some applications for civil cases are not means tested (e.g. care cases/mental health cases).
- LASPO and government cuts have reduced the availability of legal aid.
This has led to legal aid deserts and a lower standard of defence as its not business smart to taking cases with such little pay.
- If a person cannot afford legal aid, there is a breach of Article 6
The criminal process
Trial by jury enables jury members to use their view of justice rather than adhere strictly to the rules of law (Ponting – jury acquitted a civil servant charged under the Official Secrets Act).
Evidence of previous convictions is not generally admissible unless the facts are strikingly similar.
Evidence obtained illegallymay be admissible (Jeffrey – an illegal search uncovered drugs).
In general, justice is served by the criminal process, but individual cases sometimes expose a lack of justice that is not always remedied at a later date.
Appeals
The ability to rectify unfair/incorrect verdicts e.g. Hamilton and others (post masters), Birmingham6, Guilford4.
- Appeals can take a long time, even years to achieve justice
CCRC – Criminal Cases Review Commission
o Role is to review the cases of those it feels have been wrongly convicted of criminal offences or unfairly sentenced
Barriers to formal procedural justice
◦ Funding – police facing a gap of £1.3 billion over the next 2 years
◦ Ethnicity – black men are 5 times more likely to be stopped and searched (UK govn, Figures 2023)
Substantive justice
Concerned with the content of the law – the legal principles created by parliament and the courts need to be regarded as ‘just’.
Substantive justice – Criminal law
The principle of proportionality governs the sentencing practices of judges – the more serious the offence, the harsher the sanction which is seen as just.
◦ e.g. those convicted of murder receive a mandatory life sentence
Cocker – a husband suffocated his terminally ill wife after she asked him to and was given a life sentence.
◦ This seems disproportionate and unjust as the guidelines can be too restrictive for judges
Substantive justice – Contract law
The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 restricts the use of exclusion clauses – a person cannot exclude liability for death.
The Consumer Rights Act 2015 also protects consumers by setting out rights and remedies.
Corrective justice
The principle that those who are responsible for the wrongful losses of others have a duty to repair them.
In negligence, the aim of compensation is to restore the C to their pre-tort position. To balance this, any contributory negligence will reduce the award.
◦ The reduction is just because it is proportionate