Subjective distress, maladaptive, statistical deviancy, violation of standards of society, social discomfort, irrationality/unpredictability, and dangerousness
What are the 4 "Ds" of abnormal behavior?
Different, dysfunctional, deviant, dangerous
Always consider the behavior within its context
Context to consider is: inconsistent with societal norms, inconsistent with cultural norms, emotional distress, inconsistent with developmental norms, interferes with daily functioning
DSM-5-TR: diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, only used in the US, categorical approach
ICD-11: international classification of diseases, used by the rest of the world, more wide/broad, categorical approach
DSM-5-TR format: categories of diagnosis, each diagnosis consists of specific operationalized symptoms, need to meet specific number of symptoms to receive diagnosis, timeframe of symptoms also needed, describes relevant information
The DSM is specific on what to look for creating more consistency in healthcare
Categorical approach: DSM and ISD use, presence or absence of disorder, qualitative perspective, creates consistency, high rate of comorbidity
Dimensional approach: understanding behavior takes severity into consideration, quantitative perspective, look at whole spectrum of severity, on a continuum, more information typically
Advantages of diagnosis: gives a rough idea, creates community, no one is alone in diagnosis, communicate across providers, inform treatment
Disadvantages of diagnosis: create stereotypes, not the same between people, become the label, self-diagnosing, sometimes wrong, not fully dimensional
Epidemiology: field of study related to public health, frequency and distribution of diagnosis
Prevalence: number of active cases during a given time frame
Incidence: number of new cases that occur during a given time frame
Etiology: cause of disease "why"
Beneficence: serve a function of helping
Benefit of case studies: detailed information on a few people, comprehensive description of individual/small group, examination of rare phenomena
Disadvantage of case study: no control group, limited generalizability, poor replication, may not be able to refer causality
Correlational Design: includes self report data, relationship between two variable without manipulation
How far the number is from 0 in correlational design is the probability that it is correlated
Correlation is not causation
Positive correlation: both variables increase (+1.0)
Negative correlation: one increases and one decreases (-1.0)
No correlation: no connection between variable (0)
Pro of correlational design: easier to collect data, get large results, cheaper
Con of correlational design: bias, misused turned to misleading, no causal relationship identifiable
Experimental research: need independent variable, dependent variable, experimental group, and control group
RCT (randomized controlled trial): type of experimental research, used in medicine and therapy, randomly assign experimental and control from bigger group
Internal validity: extent that study design allows high conclusions that intervention caused outcome
External validity: ability to generalize study findings
Statistical significance: Probability results did not occur by chance
Clinical significance: does quality of life improve
Longitudinal research: multiple data collection over time, depth
Cross-sectional research: data collected at one time and place, quicker, easier, cheaper
Correlation coefficient: degree of association between two variables