How can the process of social influence from a minority group result in social change?
minority groups contribute to social influence by being consistent, committed and flexible-challenging the views held by the majority, creating a snowball effect (minority becomes the majority) and potentially leading to social crypto amnesia
minority influence = a form of social influence where a small group or individual persuade others to adopt their beliefs , leading to internalisation
for the minority group to effectively influence the majority they must be: consistent, flexible and committed
consistency - minority group must keep the same beliefs both over time and between themselves. this is effective as it draws attention to the minority view
2 types of consistency: synchronic=all members of the group are saying the same thing. diachronic = all members of the group have been saying the same thing for some time now
commitment = minority influence is more effective when the group show their dedication to their view - sometimes through making personal sacrifices
flexibility = relentless consistency of the minority group can be counter productive - instead the group should show they're willing to compromise slightly and accept valid counter - arguments
mossovici'sblue/green card study demonstrates the importance of consistency - showing that the consistent minority opinion had a greater effect of changing peoples views than an inconsistent minority
Nemeth argues minorities need to be willing to adapt viewpoints and compromise, his research highlights importance of flexibility but questions idea of consistency.