comparison of approaches

Cards (36)

  • Free Will vs Determinism
    Psychodynamic
    Psychic determinismBehaviour is determined by unconscious drives and early childhood experiences
  • Free Will vs Determinism
    Behaviourist
    Environmental determinismBehaviour is controlled by stimulus-response conditioning
  • Free Will vs Determinism
    Humanistic
    Free-willHumans have control of their own environment and are capable of change
  • Free Will vs Determinism
    Cognitive
    Determinism (soft)Behaviour is controlled by internal proccesses however, humans can choose what information they attend to.
  • Free Will vs Determinism
    Biological
    Biological determinismBehaviour is controlled by internal biological factors (genes, hormones, etc)
  • Nature vs Nurture
    Psychodynamic
    Mostly NatureBehaviour is the product of innate drives but shaped by early childhood experiences
  • Nature vs Nurture
    Behaviourist
    NurtureHumans are born as a blank slate (tabula rasa) and behaviour is learned
  • Nature vs Nurture
    Humanistic
    Mostly nurtureBehaviour is shaped by the environment as humans strive to achieve self-actualisation
  • Nature vs Nurture
    Cognitive
    Nature & NurtureBehaviour is the product of information processing and modified by experience
  • Nature vs Nurture
    Social Learning Theory
    NurtureBehaviour is learnt via classical and operant conditioning
  • Nature vs Nurture
    Biological
    NatureBehaviour is the result of innate biological factors
  • Reductionism vs Holism
    Psychodynamic
    BothBehaviour is reduced to innate drives whilst taking account of multiple aspects of human behaviour
  • Reductionism vs Holism
    Behaviourist
    Environmental reductionismBehaviour is broken down into simple stimulus-response associations
  • Reductionism vs Holism
    Humanistic
    HolismFocuses on understanding all aspects of human experience
  • Reductionism vs Holism
    Cognitive
    Environmental reductionismBehaviour is investigated in terms of isolated variables (such as STM and LTM)
  • Reductionism vs Holism
    Social Learning Theory
    Shares elements from the behaviourist and cognitive approach
  • Reductionism vs Holism
    Biological
    Biological reductionismBehaviour is broken down into biological structures and processes
  • Idiographic vs Nomothetic
    Psychodynamic
    BothAttempts to establish general laws in relation to innate drives, while considering unique experiences during childhood
  • Idiographic vs Nomothetic
    Behaviourist
    NomotheticCreates universal laws, as behaviour is a result of stimulus-response associations
  • Idiographic vs Nomothetic
    Humanistic
    IdiographicFocuses on the subjective human experience and makes no attempt to create general laws
  • Idiographic vs Nomothetic
    Cognitive
    NomotheticAttempts to establish general laws of cognitive processing but utilises an idiographic approach with case studies
  • Idiographic vs Nomothetic
    Social Learning Theory
    NomotheticAttempts to establish general laws of behaviour (such as vicarious reinforcement)
  • Idiographic vs Nomothetic
    Biological
    NomotheticCreates universal laws using human physiological explanations
  • Scientific
    Psychodynamic
    Not scientificExamines many concepts and theories which cannot be empirically tested. Relies on subjective interpretation.
  • Scientific
    Behaviourist
    ScientificThe behavioural approach utilises scientific method of investigation and embraces animal research and laboratory studies.
  • Scientific
    Humanistic
    Not scientificRejects the scientific method and is therefore unable to provide empirical evidence.
  • Scientific
    Cognitive
    Mostly scientificHowever, researchers are unable to directly observe cognitive processes
  • Scientific
    Social Learning Theory
    Mostly scientificBut takes account of mediational processes
  • Scientific
    Biological
    ScientificThe biological approach promotes the empirical scientific method of investigation
  • Tests on humans/animals
    Psychodynamic
    Test on humansLittle Hans
  • Tests on humans/animals
    Behaviourist
    Tests on animalsSkinner’s rats and Pavlov’s dogs – assumes animal and human learning is the same
  • Tests on humans/animals
    Humanistic
    Doesn’t conduct scientific testing
  • Tests on humans/animals
    Cognitive
    Test on humansBugelski and Alampay (1962)
  • Tests on humans/animals
    Social Learning Theory
    Test on humansBandura
  • Tests on humans/animals
    Biological
    Tests on humans and animalsAssumes different species of animal can be studied and compared. This can help in the search to understand human behaviour
  • free will vs determinism
    social learning theory
    soft determinism- behaviour is controlled by environmental forces, however people have choice over what they do via mediational processes