Gave pps list of nonsense syllables to learn for 6 mins
Retention period, after which the participants were asked to recall the lists
Findings- performance was less good if during retention period they were asked to describe 3 paintings
shows that the later task (describing pictures) interfered with what had been previously learned
Describe Underwoods findings
Discovered proactive inteference can have effect on memory
Analysed number of studies where pps had to recall word lists
Didn't remember new words in the list as well as the words they learned earlier on
If pps memorised 10/more lists, after 24 hrs only remembered 20% of what they learned. If only learned one list, recall was over 70%
Describe the investigation for interference by Baddeley and Hitch
Investigated interference effects in every day setting
Rugby players recalling names of teams they played over a season
If interference is correct, players who were sick and missed some games would recall the most names, and this is what Baddeley and Hitch found
Evaluation of interference?
😊supporting evidence from studies- baddeley and Hitch, muller and pilzecker. High internal and ecological validity
☹️only explains some situations of forgetting and other theories are needed for complete explanation. Only explains why we forget memories which are similar
☹️research is artificial- stimuli in lab given isn’t like things you have to memorise in every day settings, eg shopping lists, and low EV
☹️other explanations of forgetting- retrieval failure, may be more generalised to situations where mems aren’t similar