Learning theory

Cards (9)

  • AO1 - what explanation did Dollard and Miller propose?

    • ‘The ‘cupboard love’ explanation.
    • Emphasises the importance of food in attachment formation as children learn to love whoever feeds them.
  • AO1 - classical conditioning
    • Learning to associate 2 stimuli.
    • In attachment, food is the US and it leads to the UR (a feeling of pleasure).
  • AO1 - baby learns that mother produces a sense of pleasure
    • A caregiver (usually mother) starts as a NS, but as the caregiver provides food over time, they become associated with food so the NS becomes a CS.
    • Once conditioning has taken place, the caregiver produces a CR of pleasure.
    • Learning theorist believe this is the basis of love.
    • Through this, an attachment has been formed and the caregiver is now an attachment figure.
  • AO1 - operant conditioning
    • Explains why babies cry for comfort.
    • Crying leads to a response from the caregiver e.g. feeding.
    • As long as the caregiver provides the correct response, crying is reinforced as it produces a pleasurable consequence.
  • AO1 - negative reinforcement
    At the same time as the baby is reinforced for crying, the caregiver receives negative reinforcement as the crying stops.
  • AO1 - drive reduction
    • Hunger is primary drive.
    • Sears et al suggested that as caregivers provide food, the drive of hunger becomes generalised to them, therefore attachment is a second drive learned by association.
  • AO3 - ✖️counter-evidence from animal studies
    • Lorenz’s geese imprinted on the first moving object they saw regardless of whether the object was associated with food.
    • In Harlow’s research, monkeys attached themselves to a soft mother rather than the wire mother which provided milk.
    • Shows that factors other than feeding are important when forming an attachment.
  • AO3 - ✖️counter-evidence from human studies
    • Schaffer and Emerson showed that for many babies, their main attachment was not to the person who fed them.
    • Isabella et al found that interactional synchrony predicted attachment quality.
    • Both of these factors are not related to feeding.
    • This again suggests that other factors are more important when forming an attachment.
  • AO3 - ✔️elements of conditioning still may be involved
    • Seems unlikely that association with food plays a central role in attachment.
    • However, conditioning may still play some role in attachment.
    • E.g. a baby may associate warmth and comfort with a particular adult, which may influence the baby‘s choice of their main attachment figure.
    • Means that the learning theory may still be useful in understanding the development of attachments.