1. duty of care

• what case shows that a restaurant owner could only owe a duty about allergies of a customer if they actually knew about it?

  r v Kuddus
• what is the significance of the case of r v kuddus?

  it shows that a restaurant owner could only owe a duty about allergies of a customer if they actually knew about it
• what is the significance of the case of r v Zaman?

  It is an example of where a restaurant owner owed a duty of care to a patron as the owner was aware of the patron's allergy.
• what case is an example of where a restaurant owner owed a duty of care to a patron, as the owner was aware of the patron's allergy?

  R v Zaman
• Lord Mackay in the case of r v Adomako said that the ordinary negligence rules apply when deciding if there was a duty of care present