Employee recruitment methods include: media advertisements, employee referrals, employment agencies, and job fairs
Employee referrals are effective due to longer tenure, accurate job information, and accessibility through social media networks
Structured interviews are more effective in predicting employee performance compared to unstructured interviews
To perform well in interviews, candidates should research the company, dress appropriately, and use good nonverbal behavior
Steps to construct a valid, structured interview:
Conduct a thorough job analysis
Determine the best way to measure applicant's ability
Tap relevant competencies in the interview
Create structured interview questions
Standardize the scoring system
Build rapport with applicants
Explain the interview process
Use a panel of interviewers
Utilize ratings to identify the successful candidate
Steps to write a resume and cover letter:
Start with a short summary of strengths
Include sections on education and experience
Begin cover letter with a one or two-sentence opening paragraph
Explain qualifications and reasons for job fit
Express interest in the company and provide contact information
Ensure attractive formatting and avoid common mistakes
Principles for writing an effective help-wanted ad:
Provide realistic information
Include detailed descriptions
Include information about the selection process
Use creative and high-energy ads
Consider the target audience
Highlight unique selling points
Be clear and concise
Include contact information
Proofread and edit
Consider the medium
The key-issues approach to scoring interview questions is better than the typical-answer approach as it focuses on specific key issues for a comprehensive evaluation
Psychological principles of impression formation important in writing a resume include priming, primacy, short-term memory limits, relevance, unusualness, and positivity
References and letters of recommendation are not good predictors of performance due to factors such as leniency, poor reliability, fear of legal ramifications, and extraneous factors
When choosing a selection method, factors such as reliability, validity, cost, and potential for legal problems should be considered
Cognitive ability tests, job knowledge tests, biodata, work samples, and assessment centers are some of the better techniques for predicting future performance
Personality inventories, interest inventories, references, and graphology are not highly related to employee performance
Drug testing and medical exams are commonly used to screen employees prior to starting a job
Writing a well-designed rejection letter can have important organizational consequences
The trait approach can be used to score letters of recommendation by evaluating specific traits or characteristics mentioned in the letters
To choose the right type of employment test for a particular situation, factors such as reliability, validity, cost, and potential legal problems should be considered
There are different types of tests used to select employees, including cognitive ability tests, job knowledge tests, work samples, assessment centers, personality inventories, interest inventories, references, and graphology
To create a biodata instrument, there are two approaches: the file approach and the questionnaire approach
To write a well-designed rejection letter, steps include addressing the applicant personally, expressing appreciation for their application, providing a compliment about their qualifications, informing about the hiring decision, wishing them luck for the future, and promising to keep their resume on file
Providing reference information is important to help prospective employers make informed decisions about potential hires and prevent negligent hiring
Factors in choosing a selection method include reliability, validity, cost-efficiency, fairness, and legal defensibility
The most valid selection battery includes a cognitive ability test and either a work sample, an integrity test, or a structured interview
Employers should test employees for drugs to ensure a safe and drug-free workplace, reduce employee drug use, and comply with legal requirements
Integrity tests have drawbacks in terms of fairness and accuracy, impacting public relations and applicant perception
The evaluation of selection techniques and decisions involves assessing reliability, validity, cost-efficiency, fairness, and legal defensibility of selection methods to predict job performance and make informed hiring decisions
Reliability:
Refers to the extent to which a selection measure produces consistent and error-free results
Three common methods for determining test reliability: test-retest method, alternate-forms method, and internal consistency method
Validity:
Degree to which a selection method accurately predicts job-related behavior and measures the intended construct
Five ways to validate a test: content validity, criterion validity, construct validity, known-group validity, face validity
Cost-efficiency:
Considers costs associated with purchasing, administering, and scoring selection tests
Fairness:
Ensures selection methods do not discriminate against protected groups and comply with legal requirements
Legal defensibility:
Ability of selection methods to withstand legal challenges and adhere to relevant laws and regulations
Evaluation of selection techniques involves assessing reliability, validity, cost-efficiency, fairness, and legal defensibility to ensure effectiveness, fairness, and legal compliance
Steps to determine the reliability of a test:
Test-retest method: Administering the same test on two separate occasions
Alternate-forms method: Administering two different forms of the same test
Internal consistency method: Splitting the test into two halves and correlating the scores
Scorer reliability:
Refers to the extent to which two or more people scoring a test agree on the test scores
Particularly important for subjective tests or tests with no one correct answer
Five ways to validate a test:
Content validity: Examines the extent to which test items sample the content they are supposed to measure
Criterion validity: Correlates test scores with measures of job performance
Construct validity: Assesses the extent to which a test measures the intended construct
Known-group validity: Compares test scores of different groups known to differ on the construct being measured
Face validity: Assesses the extent to which a test appears to measure what it is intended to measure
How to find information about tests:
Refer to reliable sources such as the Nineteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook (MMY) or Tests in Print VIII
Sources contain information on reliability, validity, and reviews by test experts
How to determine the utility of a selection test:
Use Taylor-Russell tables to estimate correct decisions based on accuracy and successful employees
Use Brogden-Cronbach-Gleser Utility Formula to calculate cost savings by using the test
Steps to evaluate a test for potential legal problems:
Understand factors affecting test reliability
Validate the test using content, criterion, construct, known-group, and face validity
Find information about the test's purpose, administration, scoring, and potential biases
Determine the utility of the selection test in predicting job performance
Evaluate the test for potential legal issues such as measurement bias or predictive bias
Steps to use test scores to make personnel selection decisions:
Administer valid and fair selection tests
Combine test scores using statistical procedures like multiple regression
Evaluate different approaches like top-down selection, rules of three, passing scores, and banding
Consider reliability, validity, cost-efficiency, and fairness when using selection tests
Difference between reliability and validity:
Reliability: Consistency and stability of test scores over time
Validity: Degree to which a test measures what it is intended to measure