How does a minority influence create social change?
Drawing attention.
Consistency.
Deeperprocessing:
The augmentation principle:
Commitment.
Snowball effect:
Social-crypto amnesia:
Social Change AO3: Weakness:
One issue with social change is that it happens slowly and can take time for attitudes to change.
For example, Nemeth argues that the effect of minorities is indirect, this is because majorities are usually influenced by one matter at hand, rather than a central issue.
For example, hose pipe ban.
Furthermore, carrier bag ban.
Considered a limitation because its role in social influence is limited.
Social Change AO3: Weakness:
Social change is often resisted.
Often people do not want to be associated with stereotypes that minorities bring.
Bashir et al (2013) found that people resist social change:
Feminists and Environmentalists.
Furthermore, this supports the role of minority influence as it demonstrates that minorities can never be influential unless they can attract the attention of the majority.
Social Change AO3: Strength:
A strength of social change explanations is support from research into normative social influence (NSI).
This shows people often conform to fit in, leading to wider change.
For example, Nolan et al. (2008) found energy use dropped more when messages referenced others’ behaviour, supporting NSI’s role in change.
Alternatively, Foxtrot et al. argue social change is more effective when minority influence includes identification and consistency.
This highlights the value of combining NSI with minority influence, making the explanation more realistic and applicable.