Validity, Reliability, and Pilot Studies

Cards (17)

  • Validity:
    • Validity is a measure of the truth. It tests if the tool you are using measures what it intends to measure.
  • Internal Validity:
    • How much do the findings of the dependant variable have to do with the independent variable and no other factors
  • External Validity:
    • All about whether our results can be generalised beyond the study.
  • Population Validity:
    • External validity – can they be generalised to wider population.
  • Ecological Validity:
    • Can the results be generalised to the real world.
  • Lack of mundane realism:
    • Participants are asked to perform something atypical.
  • Temporal Validity:
    • The findings of a study or concepts of a particular theory hold true.
  • Testing Validity:
    • Face validity:
    • When an independent expert looks at the measure being used and assesses if it will measure its aim.
    • Concurrent Validity:
    • Comparing the new procedure with a similar procedure that has been done before and where the validity has been established.
    • Predictive Validity:
    • The extent to which a score on a scale or test predicts future score on the same measure.
  • Improving Validity:
    • Controlling more variables.
    • Improving measurement techniques, increasing randomisation.
    • Reducing sample bias.
    • Adding control groups.
  • Reliability:
    • Reliability is a measure of consistency, if a particular measurement is repeated and the same result is obtained, then it is described as reliable.
    • If a test lacks reliability, it also lacks validity
  • External Reliability:
    • This measures consistency from one occasion to another.
    • To improve external reliability, we can do TEST-RETEST, where participants do the same test on different occasions.
    • High correlation between the results means high external reliability.
  • Internal Reliability:
    • This measures the extent to which a test is consistent within itself.
    • Can be assessed using SPLIT-HALF method.
    • If the two halves of the test produce similar results, it implied that the test has internal reliability.
  • Improving Reliability: Inter-rater reliability:
    • The consistency of a researcher’s behaviour.
    • A researcher should carry out interviews in the same way more than once.
  • Improving Reliability: Improving questionnaires:
    • Should be measured using test-retest and then compared with two data sets.
    • If this produces a low test-retest reliability then some items may need to be re-written.
  • Improving Reliability: Improving Interviews:
    • Best way is to use the same interviewer each time.
    • Interviewer must be trained to avoid ambiguity.
  • Improving Reliability: Improving experiments:
    • Easily repeated = more reliable.
  • Improving Reliability: Improving observations:
    • These can be improved by operationalising behaviour categories – making sure they are measurable and specific.