describe the study by Johnson and Scott of anxiety on the effect of eyewitness testimony
asked pps to sit in a waiting room where they heard a heated argument in an adjoining room
saw a man run out with either a pen covered in grease or a bloody knife (low vs high anxiety inducing)
pps asked to identify the man using photos
FINDINGS- accuracy of identification was 49% with the greasy pen, 33% with the bloody knife
monitored eye movements and found that eyes were focused on the knife and not the face
what is the weapon's focus effect?
when a weapon is present during a crime, people will focusattention onto it rather than other important details of a crime such as a criminal's face
what study is there to show that anxiety has a positive effect on EWT?
Christianson and Hubinette interviewed 58 witnesses to a real life bank robbery, 4-15 mths after robberies
all witnesses showed good memory for the events of the robbery (over 75% accurate recall) showing that anxiety doesn't reduce the accuracy of recall
concluded memories for negative events is better than for neutral events
what is the Yerkes-Dodson effect?
moderate levels of anxiety lead to the best recall
if anxiety is too high or low, accurate memories for events are limited
evaluation of anxiety in affecting the accuracy of EWT?
☹️other explanations- misleading info
☹️WFE may not be caused by anxiety but surprise- Pickel- someone running through hairdresser with wallet, handgun, scissors or raw chicken. Identification of the person was least accurate in the high surprise rather than high threat conditions
☹️lab studies- may not generate accurate inductions of anxiety as real life situations might- may be why Christianson and Hubinette's findings are at odds with Johnson and Scott
☹️no simple conclusion- depends on the type of crime -accuracy for recall of violent crimes is more accurate than for non-violent crimes it was found- so WFE may not be generalised to all crimes