memory

Cards (39)

  • coding is the format the info is stored in
  • in STM info is stored acoustically
  • in LTM info is stored semantically
  • Baddley conducted research to test for the coding in STM and LTM, he found that more mistakes were made when recalling acoustically similar words instantly
  • capacity is the amount of info kept
  • in STM 7+/-2 items can be kept in the store
  • in LTM unlimited amount of info can be kept in the store
  • Miller proposed the magic number seven and Jacobs concluded that we can recall around 7 letters after intervals
  • duration is how long info is stored
  • in STM info can be stored for 18-30 seconds
  • in LTM info can be stored for forever
  • peterson and peterson conducted research investigating duration by making ppts recall trigrams whilst counting backwards in three from a given number. majority of ppts were able to recall trigrams up to 18 seconds.
  • bahrick conducted research on LTM duration by using photo recognition. 90% of ex classmates were able to match name with faces after 15years and after 46years 70% were able to
  • evaluation of coding, duration, and capacity
    strengths
    • bahrick used meaningful stimuli, high mundane realism and ecological validity
    weaknesses
    • peterson and miller lacks mundane realism, the use of artificial stimuli
  • multi-store model of memory
    1. sensory register: sub store for five senses, huge capacity, duration less than 1 second, iconic and echoic
    2. STM: acoustically coded, 7+/-2 items, 18-30s duration
    3. LTM: semantic, unlimited capacity, long duration
  • evaluation of MSM
    weakness
    • different types of LTM is proposed, unconsciously and consciously recalled info, too simple
    • type of rehearsal is important, elaborative rehearsal more preferable to prolonged
    • multiple types of STM, patient KF were able to recall visual stimuli but couldn't auditory stimuli
  • types of LTM
    1. episodic: personal meaning
    2. semantic: general knowledge
    3. procedural: learnt skills and recalled unconsciously
  • evaluation on types of LTM
    strengths
    • semantic memories are recalled from the left pre-frontal cortex and episodic memories are recalled from the right pre-frontal cortex, different neurological basis
    • practical applications, episodic memory is most likely affected in a cognitive impairment, targeted treatments
    • clive wearing was able to play the piano but could not recall episodic memory
  • working memory model
    1. central executive: attentional process, role is to allocate info to slave systems
    2. phonological loop: auditory info
    3. articulatory control: converts speech
    4. phonological store: converts what we see
    5. 3. visuo-spatial sketchpad: visual and spatial info
    6. inner scribe: spatial movement
    7. visual cache: colour and shape
    8. 4. episodic buffer: combines all data and links STM and LTM
  • evaluation of working memory model
    strengths
    • patient KF, recall of visual info in STM but poor recall of auditory stimuli
    • dual-task performance, decreased performance when simultaneously performed visual and verbal task, central executive has limited processing capacity
    weaknesses
    • central executive not defined properly, process is vague
  • interference is when there is a blockage when recalling memory by another
  • proactive interference: past info blocking new ones
    retroactive interference: recent info blocking old infos
  • Mcgeoh and Mcdonald tested retroactive interference. ppts were better at recalling unnecessary words compared to the condition where another list of words were proposed
  • evaluation of interference
    strength
    • lab studies, validity increased
    • baddley and hitch, rugby players, more games played more interference happened when recalling older games
    weaknesses
    • artificial stimuli has no personal meaning to ppts
  • retrieval failure is forgetting when sufficient cues are not present
  • context dependant forgetting is when external cues are not present
    research - godden and baddley
    divers recalled better when in the same environment as where they learnt
  • state dependant forgetting is when internal cues are not present
    research support - carter and cassaday
    used antihistamines and a placebo
  • evaluation of retrieval failure
    weakness
    • studies lack ecological validity, difficult to find such polar environments like water and land, inaccurate deception of forgetting
    • may tested recognition of words
    • testing for IQ
  • eyewitness testimony is the accuracy of info recalled by a witness in a crime
  • leading questions were tested by loftus and palmer. ppts watched a clip of a car crash and asked to estimate the speed of the car by using different verbs in the question. 'smashed' has the highest estimate compared to 'contacted' . 'smashed' group also reported broken glass in the clip after 2 weeks
  • post even discussion was tested by gabbert et al. he used matched pairs design and showed a clip of a crime a scene to one ppt, 71% of info was inaccurate with post even discussion
  • memory conformity: we are wrong and the other one is right
  • evaluation on misleading info
    weakness
    • methodological criticism, mainly young ppts were used, inaccurate representation for older peoplre
    • demand characteristics could've been shown
    • lacks mundane realism, clips do not give the same amount of emotional arousal
  • johnson and scott and cocluded that anxiety may show a negative effect in recalling info.
  • high anxiety condition overheard a heated argument and a man with a bloody knife walked out, opposed to a greasy pen in the other condition. ppts were asked to identify the man later and only 16% of the high anxiety condition got it right
  • weapon focus effect: attention drawn towards weapon
  • yullie and cutshall suggested anxiety may show a positive effect on EWT
  • followed 13 witnesses after 5 months of a real life shooting. people who were closer to the crime scene were able to accurately recall info. heightened anxiety draws attention to the fight or flight response.
  • weakness of weapon focus effect
    it could simply just lead to surprise as a chicken in a salon caused high accuracy of EWT