Baddley conducted research to test for the coding in STM and LTM, he found that more mistakes were made when recalling acoustically similar words instantly
capacity is the amount of info kept
in STM 7+/-2 items can be kept in the store
in LTM unlimited amount of info can be kept in the store
Miller proposed the magic number seven and Jacobs concluded that we can recall around 7 letters after intervals
duration is how long info is stored
in STM info can be stored for 18-30 seconds
in LTM info can be stored for forever
peterson and peterson conducted research investigating duration by making ppts recall trigrams whilst counting backwards in three from a given number. majority of ppts were able to recall trigrams up to 18 seconds.
bahrick conducted research on LTM duration by using photo recognition. 90% of ex classmates were able to match name with faces after 15years and after 46years 70% were able to
evaluation of coding, duration, and capacity
strengths
bahrick used meaningful stimuli, high mundane realism and ecological validity
weaknesses
peterson and miller lacks mundane realism, the use of artificial stimuli
multi-store model of memory
sensory register: sub store for five senses, huge capacity, duration less than 1 second, iconic and echoic
different types of LTM is proposed, unconsciously and consciously recalled info, too simple
type of rehearsal is important, elaborative rehearsal more preferable to prolonged
multiple types of STM, patient KF were able to recall visual stimuli but couldn't auditory stimuli
types of LTM
episodic: personal meaning
semantic: general knowledge
procedural: learnt skills and recalled unconsciously
evaluation on types of LTM
strengths
semantic memories are recalled from the left pre-frontal cortex and episodic memories are recalled from the right pre-frontal cortex, different neurological basis
practical applications, episodic memory is most likely affected in a cognitive impairment, targeted treatments
clive wearing was able to play the piano but could not recall episodic memory
working memory model
central executive: attentional process, role is to allocate info to slave systems
phonological loop: auditory info
articulatory control: converts speech
phonological store: converts what we see
3. visuo-spatial sketchpad: visual and spatial info
inner scribe: spatial movement
visual cache: colour and shape
4. episodic buffer: combines all data and links STM and LTM
evaluation of working memory model
strengths
patient KF, recall of visual info in STM but poor recall of auditory stimuli
dual-task performance, decreased performance when simultaneously performed visual and verbal task, central executive has limited processing capacity
weaknesses
central executive not defined properly, process is vague
interference is when there is a blockage when recalling memory by another
proactive interference: past info blocking new ones
retroactive interference: recent info blocking old infos
Mcgeoh and Mcdonald tested retroactive interference. ppts were better at recalling unnecessary words compared to the condition where another list of words were proposed
evaluation of interference
strength
lab studies, validity increased
baddley and hitch, rugby players, more games played more interference happened when recalling older games
weaknesses
artificial stimuli has no personal meaning to ppts
retrieval failure is forgetting when sufficient cues are not present
context dependant forgetting is when external cues are not present
research - godden and baddley
divers recalled better when in the same environment as where they learnt
state dependant forgetting is when internal cues are not present
research support - carter and cassaday
used antihistamines and a placebo
evaluation of retrieval failure
weakness
studies lack ecological validity, difficult to find such polar environments like water and land, inaccurate deception of forgetting
may tested recognition of words
testing for IQ
eyewitness testimony is the accuracy of info recalled by a witness in a crime
leading questions were tested by loftus and palmer. ppts watched a clip of a car crash and asked to estimate the speed of the car by using different verbs in the question. 'smashed' has the highest estimate compared to 'contacted' . 'smashed' group also reported broken glass in the clip after 2 weeks
post even discussion was tested by gabbert et al. he used matched pairs design and showed a clip of a crime a scene to one ppt, 71% of info was inaccurate with post even discussion
memory conformity: we are wrong and the other one is right
evaluation on misleading info
weakness
methodological criticism, mainly young ppts were used, inaccurate representation for older peoplre
demand characteristics could've been shown
lacks mundane realism, clips do not give the same amount of emotional arousal
johnson and scott and cocluded that anxiety may show a negative effect in recalling info.
high anxiety condition overheard a heated argument and a man with a bloody knife walked out, opposed to a greasy pen in the other condition. ppts were asked to identify the man later and only 16% of the high anxiety condition got it right
weapon focus effect: attention drawn towards weapon
yullie and cutshall suggested anxiety may show a positive effect on EWT
followed 13 witnesses after 5 months of a real life shooting. people who were closer to the crime scene were able to accurately recall info. heightened anxiety draws attention to the fight or flight response.
weakness of weapon focus effect
it could simply just lead to surprise as a chicken in a salon caused high accuracy of EWT