ao1: adorno ET al (1950) the authoritarian personality - PROCEDURE
The study investigated unconscious attitudes towards other ethnic groups of more than 2000 middle-class white Americans.
Several scales were developed, including the potential-for-fascism scale (F-scale). Examples from the F-scale (rated on scale 1 to 6 where 6 = agree strongly):
'Obedience and respect for authority are the most important virtues for children to learn.'
'There is hardly anything lower than a person who does not feel great love, gratitude and respect for his parents.'
ao1: Adorno et al (1950) the authoritarian personalit- FINDINGS
Authoritarians (who scored high on the F-scale and other measures) identified with 'strong' people and were contemptuous of the 'weak'.
They were conscious of their own and others' status, showing excessive respect and deference to those of higher status.
Authoritarian people also had a cognitive style where there was no 'fuzziness' between categories of people, with fixed and distinctive stereotypes (prejudices) about other groups.
ao1: AUTHORITARIAN PERSONALITY
HIGH OBEDIENCE IS PATHOLOGICAL:
Adorno et al. (1950) believed that unquestioning obedience is a psychological disorder, and tried to find its causes in the individual's personality
ao1: AUTHORITARIAN PERSONALITY
EXTREME RESPECT FOR AUTHORITY AND CONTEMPT FOR ‘INFERIORS’:
Adornoet al. concluded that people with an Authoritarian Personality are especially obedient to authority. They:
Have exaggerated respect for authority and submissiveness to it.
Express contempt for people of inferior social status Authoritarians tend to follow orders and view 'other' groups as responsible for society's ills
ao1: the authoritarian personality
Originates in childhood (e.g. overly strict parenting):
Authoritarian Personality forms in childhood through harsh parenting - extremely strict discipline, expectation of absolute loyalty, impossibly high standards, and severe criticism.
It is also characterised by conditional love - parents' love depends entirely on how their child behaves
ao1: authoritarian personality
Hostility is displaced onto social inferiors:
These experiences create resentment and hostility in the child, but they cannot express these feelings directly against their parents because they fear reprisals.
So the feelings are displaced onto others who are weaker - this is scapegoating. This is a psychodynamic explanation.
ao3: One strength is evidence that authoritarians are obedient.
Elms and Milgram (1966) interviewed 20 fully obedient participants from Milgram's original abedience studies.
They scored significantly higher on the F-scale than a comparison group of 20 disobedient participants.
This suggests that abedient people may share many of the characteristics of people with an Authoritarian Personality.
ao3: COUNTERPOINT TO EVIDENCE THAT AUTHORITARIANS ARE OBEDIENT
However, subscales of the F-scale showed that obedientparticipants had characteristics that were unusual for authoritarians. For example they did not experience high levels of punishment in childhood.
This suggests a complex link and means that authoritarianism is not a useful predictor of obedience.
ao3: One limitation is authoritarianism can't explain a whole country's behaviour.
Millions of individuals in Germany displayed obedient and anti- Semitic behaviour - but can't all have had the same personality.
It seems unlikely the majority of Germany's population had an Authoritarian Personality. A more likely explanation is that Germans identified with the Nazi state.
Therefore social identity theory (the view that our behaviour and attitudes are strongly influenced by those of the groups we identify with) may be a better explanation.
ao3: One limitation is that the F-scale is politically biased.
Christie and Jahoda (1954) suggest the F-scale aims to measure tendency towards extreme right-wing ideology
But right-wing and left-wing authoritarianism (e.g. Chinese Maoism) both insist on complete obedience to political authority
Therefore Adorno's theory is not a comprehensive dispositional explanation as it doesn't explain obedience to left-wing authoritarianism, i.e. it is politically biased