Jespersen, 1922: 'Women's language is a projection of their deficiency compared to the male norm. Women's language is deficient because they have an innate deficiency!'
Characteristics of women's language as deficient
Talk a lot
Have a smaller vocabulary
Tend toward hyperbole
Use empty, base adjectives
Lakoff, 1975: 'Unlike Jespersen, who assumes that women are born deficient, Lakoff concludes that women's language is deficient due to socialisation. Lakoff claimed that women's language is less authoritative/certain than men's.'
Characteristics of women's language as deficient according to Lakoff
Hedge more ('sort of')
Use empty, base adjectives
Use more tag questions
Use more euphemisms
Use indirect speech (e.g. crimson instead of red)
Use super polite forms and apologetic phrasing
Criticism by Janet Holmes (1992)
spender theorised-
language is male dominated
Tannen
men build their status whereas women seek and offer support
Ahat did Holmes say about tag questions
Helped mantain discussion and said that these boosted the strength of the argument.
men interrupted more often and therefore dominate conversation..
Limitations: very small sample, lack of variety in subjects
Theorist?
Zimmerman and West
Tannen said women seek different purposes in their speech
Status vs support
Advice vs understanding
Independence vs intimacy
Info vs feelings
Order vs proposals
Jesperson says male language is the norm and women's is deficient
spender concluded womens language is
male dominated
according to jesperson,did men or women use more non fluency features
women ex.ummmm
features that make womens speech weak according to lakoff
Lacking a sense of humour, Empty adjectives, Special lexicon, Overuse of intensifiers, A hypercorrect grammar, Over-apologising