aims to transform quantitative data into quantitative data to systematically draw conclusions
how is it made CONTENT ANA
gather qualitative data and families yourself with it and then identify re occurring themes called thematic analysis which can be used to create code for categories. Tally every time you see the code occurring. Use the numbers to do your descriptive and statistical analysis
strength of CONTENT ANA
allows for conclusions - allows for comparisons - interrater reliability
Weakness of CONENT ANA
time consuming (money/effort) - subjective categories bias in seleting themes different interpretations
Aim
A general expression of what the researcher intends to investigate
Hypothesis
A precise and operationalised statement about the assumed relationship between variables
Directional Hypothesis
States the direction of the predicted difference between two conditions or two groups of participants
Non-directional Hypothesis
Predicts simply that there is a difference between two conditions or two groups of participants without stating the direction of the difference
Independent Variable
Some event that either naturally varies or is directly manipulated by an experiment in order to test it's effect on another variable
Dependent Variable
A measurable outcome of the action of the independent variable in an experiment
Operationalise
Ensuring that variables are in a form that can be easily measured.
Experimental method
A researcher causes the independent variable to vary and records the effect of the IV on the dependent variable. The DV must be operationalised.
Control
(Refers to) The extent to which any variable is held constant or regulated by a researcher
Extraneous Variables
'Nuisance' variables that do not vary systematically with the IV. A researcher may control some of these.
Confounding Variable
Change systematically with the IV so we cannot be sure if any observed change in the DV is due to the CV or the IV. CVs must be controlled.
Demand Characteristics
Refers to any cue from the researcher or research situation that may reveal the aim of the study
Investigator Effect
Any effect of the investigator's behaviour on the outcome of the research (the DV)
Randomisation
The use of chance when designing investigations to control for the effects of bias
Standardisation
Using exactly the same formalised procedures for all ps in a research study
Control groups
Control groups are used for the purpose of setting a comparison. They act as a 'baseline' and help establish causation.
Single Blind Design
A ps doesn't know the aims of the study so that demand characteristics are reduced.
Double Blind Design
Both ps and researcher don't know the aims of the study to reduce demand characteristics and investigator effects.
Participant Variables
Individual differences. Differences among participants, overcome by a large sample size which dilutes any extremes
Situational Variables
People act differently in different situations. Time of day, Lab setting vs Natural setting
Validity
(Refers to) Whether an observed effect is a genuine one
External Validity
The degree to which a research finding can be generalised
Ecological Validity
A type of External Validity - generalising to other settings
Population Validity
A type of External Validity - generalising to other groups of people
Temporal Validity
A type of External Validity - generalising to other times/over time
Cultural Validity
A type of External Validity - generalising to other cultures
Internal Validity
The degree to which an observed effect was due to the experimental manipulation rather than other factors such as extraneous or confounding variables
Mundane Realism
(Refers to) How a study mirrors the real world. The research environment is realistic to the degree to which experiences encountered in the research environment will occur in the real world.
Independent Groups
One group does one condition the other group does the other condition. Each ps experiences one condition and they're randomly allocated to the groups.
✔️no order effects
✔️no demand characteristics
✖️more ps
✖️ps variables
Repeated Measures
Participants doing both conditions. To avoid order effects conditions should be counterbalanced. AB-BA
✔️less ps
✔️no ps variables
✖️order effects
✖️demand characteristics
Matched Pairs
Individuals matched up by characteristic (eg by IQ) and separated with one half of the pair in each group to overcome individual differences
✔️less ps variables
✔️no order effects
✖️more ps
✖️matching is not perfect
Laboratory Experiment
conducted in a lab, a highly controlled environment
✔️ highly controlled evs and dvs
✔️ can be easily replicated
✖️hard to generalise
✖️demand characteristics
Field Experiment
A natural setting.
The researcher can control the IV.
✔️Higher external validity
✔️No demand characteristics bc ps don't know they are taking part in a study
✖️Difficult to control CVs
✖️Ethical issues bc ps don't know they are taking part in a study
Natural Experiment
IV cannot be manipulated because it naturally exists
DV naturally occurring
✔️an ethical option
✔️high external validity
✖️natural events occur rarely
✖️ps are not randomly allocated so there is a chance of ps variables
Quasi-Experiment
The IV is based on existing differences (eg age or gender) so can't be controlled
DV naturally occurring
✔️High control
✔️Comparisons can be made btwn ppl (eg ppl with and without autism)
✖️Ps are not randomly allocated so chance of ps variables
✖️Causal relationships not demonstrated
Population
The large group of ppl that a researcher is interested in studying